2022
DOI: 10.3389/fchem.2022.800696
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Asymmetrical Flow Field-Flow Fractionation Methods for Quantitative Determination and Size Characterization of Thiols and for Mercury Size Speciation Analysis in Organic Matter-Rich Natural Waters

Abstract: Asymmetrical flow field-flow fractionation (AF4) efficiently separates various macromolecules and nano-components of natural waters according to their hydrodynamic sizes. The online coupling of AF4 with fluorescence (Fluo) and UV absorbance (UV) detectors (FluoD and UVD, respectively) and inductively coupled plasma–mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) provides multidimensional information. This makes it a powerful tool to characterize and quantify the size distributions of organic and inorganic nano-sized components and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The content through fluorescence quantification might correspond only the surface thiol of NOM but not total thiol. In addition, the thiol content may be underestimated by this fluorescence quantification due to inner-filter effect of NOM . Therefore, the actual contribution of sulfur groups to EAC might be higher than the estimation from fluorescence quantification.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The content through fluorescence quantification might correspond only the surface thiol of NOM but not total thiol. In addition, the thiol content may be underestimated by this fluorescence quantification due to inner-filter effect of NOM . Therefore, the actual contribution of sulfur groups to EAC might be higher than the estimation from fluorescence quantification.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In addition, the thiol content may be underestimated by this fluorescence quantification due to inner-filter effect of NOM. 43 Therefore, the actual contribution of sulfur groups to EAC might be higher than the estimation from fluorescence quantification. For example, the thiol content in SRNOM measured by EXAFS was approximately 17 times that of the fluorescence method; 42 in other words, the contribution of sulfur groups in SRNOM to EAC might be 1.35%.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“… 7 These small fluorophores have been highly instrumental in the development of biochemical methodologies, mainly those involving the detection and analysis of sulfhydryl species, such as H 2 S and glutathione, both in vitro and in vivo. 8 They have also made notable contributions to a variety of biologically related disciplines like enzymology, 9 pharmacology, 10 toxicology, 11 and environmental studies 12 and have also been applied, among other things, in fundamental investigations of photophysical processes 13 and even as photolabile protecting groups. 14 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%