(Fig. 1). The red layer is ∼10 cm thick at Site U1305 and ∼20 cm thick at U1302 (Figs 2-4). The base of the layer is very sharp at both sites, suggesting rapid onset of deposition with little bioturbation. At Site U1305, the top of the layer is well defined, whereas at Site U1302 the top of the layer is more diffuse with a distinct tail, probably the result of mixing by bioturbation. The bright red colour of the layer is distinctive and marked by anomalously high values of a * (red-green colour parameter) at both sites. A peak in the first derivative of the reflectance spectrum at 565 nm suggests that the red colour is primarily imparted by haematite in the sediment 6 (see Supplementary Information).Core scanning X-ray fluorescence (XRF) measurements show high values of Ca/Sr in the red layer interval at both sites (Figs 3 and 4), indicating an increase in the proportion of strontium-poor detrital carbonate relative to strontium-rich biogenic carbonate 7 . The peak carbonate content of the sediment within the layer is ∼30% at Site U1305 and ∼40% at Site U1302. At Site U1305, the carbonate peak corresponds to a significant increase above background levels whereas at Site U1302 the increase is less pronounced, most likely owing to relatively higher deposition rates of synsedimentary biogenic carbonate during the interval.Bulk carbonate δ 18 O shows a strong decrease to values of about −5 (versus Vienna PeeDee Belemnite) within the red layer at both sites, which is typical of detrital carbonate from Hudson Bay 8 . Organic biomarkers provide further evidence of the source of the red layer. At both sites the red layer contains high abundances of a suite of organic compounds normally absent in recent sediments. These petrogenic compounds include carotenoid-derived aromatic hydrocarbons (for example, isorenieratane and palaerenieratane), aromatic steroids and secohopanoids (see Supplementary Information). The relative abundances of these compounds are approximately three times higher at Site U1302 than at Site