Asymmetries and Climate Futures: Working with Waters in an Indigenous Australian Settlement

Abstract

This paper focuses on a water management project in the remote Aboriginal community of Milingimbi, Northern Australia. Drawing on materials and experiences from two distinct stages of this project, we revisit a policy report and engage in ethnographic storytelling in order to highlight a series of sensing practices associated with water management. In the former, a working symmetry between Yolngu and Western water knowledges is actively sought through the practices of the project. However, in the latter, recurrent asymmetries in the research work continue to appear: a bilingual diagram of water usage is displayed but produces confusion; measuring a water hole for salinity, a member of the scientific team throws in a water meter, while a Yolngu elder prefers the telling of an ancestral story; a collaborative 3-D mapping exercise invites participation from community members but struggles to develop an outcome that differs from existing maps used by scientists and government staff. Focusing on these moments as subtle points of rupture, we suggest that attending to “seeing,” “telling,” and “mapping” in both stages of this water management project offers a way to explore the political work of crafting climate futures and beginning to interrogate differing means for “doing difference” within them.

A transdisciplinary engagement with Australian Aboriginal water and the hydrology of a small bedrock island

“…This is indicated by the growing concern of freshwater scarcity demonstrated by the hydrogeological investigation, which showed the critical balance between the recharge rate of the freshwater aquifer and discharge rate into the surrounding sea. The relationships of caring between Yolŋu water experts and the water supply company, PWC, had been a major community concern over an extended period of time (Spencer et al 2019).…”

Improving the climate change mitigation regime of major emitting countries: The case of South Africa, China, Germany and the United States of America

“…Thus, policy asymmetry would occur where countries' mitigation strategies are inconsistent with policy goals. Climate governance goals such as emissions reduction and net‐zero targets need corresponding multi‐dimensional strategies for their realisation at national and international levels (Abraham‐Dukuma, 2020; Spencer et al, 2019; Werksman, 2010). Thus, it is valuable to reflect on our case study countries' circumstances within the parameters of our results.…”

Air-appropriation: The imperial origins and legacies of the Anthropocene

“…Critical scholars have criticized carbon metrics as a form of ‘ecological epistemicide’ (Moreno et al, 2015) because it eclipses alternative ways of knowing and being on the earth. Many calls for a ‘decolonization of the Anthropocene’ have therefore advanced a critique of western-modernist naturalistic (De Castro, 2014) ontologies (Davis & Todd, 2017; Spencer et al, 2019), that is, of ontologies that assume that there is only one, homogenous nature out there and that disregard alternative, non-western ontologies of natureculture. They criticize what John Law (2015, p. 127) has called the ‘one-world-world’ view, which assumes that the world is just one abstract ‘large space-time box’, without recognizing the multiple ontologies of coexisting worlds residing on and making up the earth.…”