Asymmetries in the elastic and inelastic scattering of polarized protons from C and Si

Spin-orbit deformation in the inelastic scattering of polarized protons from12C and16O

“…Good agreement between the CC calculations using optical model parameters from Table 1 and the cross section and analyzing power data [4,[10][11][12][13] has been obtained by varying the spin-orbit deformation strength. Figures 1, 2 and 3 show the best agreement between these analyzing power data and the calculations.…”

A Comparison of Spectroscopic Models of Low Excitation 2+ States in 24Mg and 28Si from Inelastic Proton Scattering

“…The reaction data used (Craig et al 1966;Lewis et al 1967; include analysing powers from the excitations of the 2: states (projectile energies of 49·2 and 49 MeV for 24Mg and 28Si respectively). We use an antisymmetrized microscopic DWA method of analysis (Geramb et al 1975) in which data predictions relate to scattering amplitudes that have the form…”

“…in which the l±) are the relevant projectile wavefunctions (we use best-fit optical potential wavefunctions; Craig et al 1966;Lewis et al 1967) and the rPjm are the single-proton (neutron) bound state wavefunctions (harmonic oscillator wave-functions associated with oscillator energies of 14·4 and 13· 7 MeV for 24Mg and 28Si respectively).…”

The $$\overrightarrow p - Si$$ elastic scattering in the region of giant multipole resonances

“…1 is intended for proton energies higher than 15MeV, typically in the range between 15 and 30MeV. There was thus a need for detailed experimental information as a function of energy and angle, because some existing measurements at 17 and 29 MeV [9,10] were not of sufficient accuracy and angular detail, although they permitted to forecast the usefulness of the polarimeter in this energy range. Below 10MeV it has been shown by Hardekopf et al [11] that there are rapid variations of the analyzing power as a function of energy, limiting somewhat the applicability as a polarization analyzer.…”