2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.rssm.2012.06.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Asymmetries in the opportunity structure. Intergenerational mobility trends in Europe

Abstract: It remains unclear whether social mobility is increasing in the advanced nations. The answer may depend on mobility patterns within very recent birth cohorts. We use the inter-generational module in the 2005 EU-SILC which allows us to include more recent cohorts. Comparing across two Nordic and three Continental European countries, we estimate inter-generational mobility trends for sons both indirectly, via social origin effects on educational attainment, and directly in terms of adult income attainment. In li… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
34
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
6
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The postponement of tracking may thus have fostered equality of opportunity with regard to educational attainment and income in opening up access to higher education, but those with a higher-income background may have simultaneously begun to deploy resources other than education to maintain their privileges. This finding reflects the asymmetric mobility pattern Esping-Andersen and Wagner (2012) describe: they suggest that Nordic welfare-state policies foster equality only among those who are disadvantaged in terms of family conditions, without influencing those with more affluent parents.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…The postponement of tracking may thus have fostered equality of opportunity with regard to educational attainment and income in opening up access to higher education, but those with a higher-income background may have simultaneously begun to deploy resources other than education to maintain their privileges. This finding reflects the asymmetric mobility pattern Esping-Andersen and Wagner (2012) describe: they suggest that Nordic welfare-state policies foster equality only among those who are disadvantaged in terms of family conditions, without influencing those with more affluent parents.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…The “countervailing” factors that can mute Matthew effects (p617 in [ 87 ]) are ceiling or floor effects, intergenerational dispersion of resources, social policy, etc. [ 84 , 87 , 93 ]. For example, the ceiling effect is often considered when discussing older adults and the Internet, since it is expected that as generations change, the increase of users in industrialized societies will slow down reaching an asymptotic limit (100%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Economic inequalities may have a number of negative social impacts. Among these are: negative influences on social cohesion (Wilkinson and Pickett, ); physical and mental health (Thorbecke and Charumilind, ; Wilkinson and Pickett, ; Kawachi et al ., ); civic and political participation (Uslaner and Brown, ; Solt, ; Lancee and Van de Werfhorst, ); solidarity (Paskov and Dewilde, ); homicide and violent crime (Thorbecke and Charumilind, ; Elgar and Aitken, ); drug abuse (Wilkinson and Pickett, ); education (Thorbecke and Charumilind, ; Costa‐Font and Gil, ); obesity (Costa‐Font and Gil, ); life satisfaction (Delhey and Kohler, ); imprisonment (Wilkinson and Pickett, ); social mobility (Esping‐Andersen and Wagner, ); social trust (Rothstein and Uslaner, ; Uslaner and Brown, ); and child well‐being (Cunha and Heckman, ) and malnutrition (Larrea and Kawachi, ).…”
Section: Unintended Environmental Consequencesmentioning
confidence: 99%