2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.topol.2005.06.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Asymmetry and bicompletion of approach spaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The previous result solves the open problem stated in [3] on the characterization of the epis in AP 0 .…”
Section: (Weak) Hereditariness Of the Closure Operatorsupporting
confidence: 63%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The previous result solves the open problem stated in [3] on the characterization of the epis in AP 0 .…”
Section: (Weak) Hereditariness Of the Closure Operatorsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…In order to describe r on M C ξ some symmetrization is involved. The definition below is inspired by the one given in [3] in the setting of approach spaces. …”
Section: (Weak) Hereditariness Of the Closure Operatormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There is an easy criterion to see whether for a reflector R, a class of morphisms U satisfying (1), (2), and (3) is the largest one with these properties. A morphism class U is said to be coessential if for every morphism u ∈ U and for every morphism f we have u • f ∈ U ⇒ f ∈ U.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A more precise definition is formulated in the next preliminary section. Two standard examples are the following: The usual bicompletion functor for quasi uniform spaces with associated firm class of morphisms consisting of all epimorphic embeddings and the bicompletion functor for approach spaces [2] for which the associated firm class coincides with the class of all embeddings that are dense with respect to the quasi metric coreflection. In this paper we prove that these basic constructions carry over to arbitrary metrically generated constructs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%