2010
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.116440
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Asymmetry in Raw Milk Safety Perceptions and Information: Implications for Risk in Fresh Produce Marketing and Policy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 24 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regulation and consumption of unpasteurised milk have been controversial since the early 20th century ( Linn, 2019 ), and there have been extensive peer-reviewed analyses on the benefits, risks and regulations ( e.g. , Draper & Green, 2002 ; Enticott, 2003 ; West, 2008 ; Knutson et al, 2010 ; Dunn, 2011 ; MacDonald et al, 2011 ; Buzby et al, 2013 ; Paxson & Helmreich, 2014 ; Knezevic, 2016 ; Rahn, Gollust & Tang, 2017 ; Willis et al, 2018 ; Berge & Baars, 2020 ; Baars et al, 2021 ). In this way, when the public is confronted with a large body of conflicting information (such as whether unpasteurised milk is safe, beneficial, or hazardous), and if selectively presented, there is the potential to yield significant differences in opinion to that of scientific experts ( Angulo, Lejeune & Rajala-Schultz, 2009 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regulation and consumption of unpasteurised milk have been controversial since the early 20th century ( Linn, 2019 ), and there have been extensive peer-reviewed analyses on the benefits, risks and regulations ( e.g. , Draper & Green, 2002 ; Enticott, 2003 ; West, 2008 ; Knutson et al, 2010 ; Dunn, 2011 ; MacDonald et al, 2011 ; Buzby et al, 2013 ; Paxson & Helmreich, 2014 ; Knezevic, 2016 ; Rahn, Gollust & Tang, 2017 ; Willis et al, 2018 ; Berge & Baars, 2020 ; Baars et al, 2021 ). In this way, when the public is confronted with a large body of conflicting information (such as whether unpasteurised milk is safe, beneficial, or hazardous), and if selectively presented, there is the potential to yield significant differences in opinion to that of scientific experts ( Angulo, Lejeune & Rajala-Schultz, 2009 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%