2011
DOI: 10.1177/0956797611403156
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Asymmetry in Resting Intracortical Activity as a Buffer to Social Threat

Abstract: Social rejection can create powerful changes in our brains and bodies. Here, we examined brain-based individual differences associated with buffering against cardiovascular threat responses to social rejection. Using electroencephalographic source localization techniques, we examined differences in intracortical asymmetry with the prediction that individuals with greater left relative to right dorsolateral prefrontal activity would show a more approach motivated response to social rejection. Eighty-four female… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

4
76
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
4
76
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, in a study of Coan and Allen (2003), a Left > Right prefrontal EEG asymmetry at rest predicted more intense (positive and negative) feelings during posed emotional facial expressions, observed for the ventrolateral and dorsolateral prefrontal electrodes. Furthermore, Koslov et al (2011) reported an association between a Left > Right EEG asymmetry in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and a greater cardiac output response to a social stressor representing a more adaptive, approach-related response profile. These findings are in line with the idea that a Left > Right asymmetry pattern in the lateral prefrontal cortex is associated with greater emotional responsivity as compared to an asymmetry in favor of the right hemisphere .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similarly, in a study of Coan and Allen (2003), a Left > Right prefrontal EEG asymmetry at rest predicted more intense (positive and negative) feelings during posed emotional facial expressions, observed for the ventrolateral and dorsolateral prefrontal electrodes. Furthermore, Koslov et al (2011) reported an association between a Left > Right EEG asymmetry in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and a greater cardiac output response to a social stressor representing a more adaptive, approach-related response profile. These findings are in line with the idea that a Left > Right asymmetry pattern in the lateral prefrontal cortex is associated with greater emotional responsivity as compared to an asymmetry in favor of the right hemisphere .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, relative inactivity of left prefrontal regions, measured in resting conditions, is assumed to be related to an affective style associated with depression proneness (e.g., Nusslock et al, 2011;Pössel et al, 2008). It has also been suggested that a relatively lower left than right prefrontal resting activity may be associated with a less resilient response profile to emotional challenges (Koslov et al, 2011). Accordingly, findings indicated that individuals showing relative inactivity of left prefrontal regions at rest may be emotionally rigid and unresponsive to emotional events .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Imaging of structural white matter integrity and connectivity, and functional neural connectivity (e.g., EEG coherence), before and after intervention may shed light on these questions. Further, imaging studies of potential changes in the activation of deeper cortical and subcortical structures, including the limbic system and measures of subcortical regulation of approach or withdrawal/flight states (e.g., Koslov et al 2011) may also highlight whether plasticity of emotion circuitry and autonomic regulation contribute to intervention outcomes in ASD.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An experience of threat is associated with pituitary-adrenocortical activity, inhibiting the release of adrenaline and producing a pattern where blood pressure increases whilst peripheral resistance declines. This model has been the subject of some debate (Blascovich et al, 2003;Wright and Kirkby, 2003), however, a recent study into the psychophysiology of social support/ rejection (Koslov et al, 2011) supported the model using measures of cardiovascular impedance in combination with frontal EEG asymmetry. These authors reported that baseline levels of frontal EEG asymmetry predicted cardiovascular reactivity in response to anger during the experience of social rejection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…challenge would lead to greater left frontal activation in conjunction with increased cardiac output and no change in blood pressure, whereas threat would be associated greater right frontal activation in combination with increased blood pressure. In addition, we wish to investigate whether motivational markers of approach/avoidance were correlated across cardiovascular and electrocortical measures as indicated by Koslov et al (2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%