2013
DOI: 10.1057/ces.2013.7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Asymmetry in the Unemployment–Output Relationship Over the Business Cycle: Evidence from Transition Economies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
20
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
20
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, the model does not suffer from autocorrelation, heteroscedasticity, model misspecification, residual non-normality and parameter instability. Overall, our main result is consistent with previous literature that confirms non-linearities in the unemployment-output relationship (Cuaresma, 2003, Cevik, Dibooglu and Barişik, 2013, Phiri, 2014, Marinkov and Geldenhuys, 2007. Despite the use of different functional forms, the results demonstrate that the labour market responds in the same way to economic recessions and economic contractions in the short-run while the long-run effect is asymmetric.…”
Section: Y +1% Y -1% Differencesupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In particular, the model does not suffer from autocorrelation, heteroscedasticity, model misspecification, residual non-normality and parameter instability. Overall, our main result is consistent with previous literature that confirms non-linearities in the unemployment-output relationship (Cuaresma, 2003, Cevik, Dibooglu and Barişik, 2013, Phiri, 2014, Marinkov and Geldenhuys, 2007. Despite the use of different functional forms, the results demonstrate that the labour market responds in the same way to economic recessions and economic contractions in the short-run while the long-run effect is asymmetric.…”
Section: Y +1% Y -1% Differencesupporting
confidence: 91%
“…To our best knowledge, no study simultaneously accounts for heterogeneity, cross-section dependence, and endogenous regressor(s) issues. 6 al., 2010), and differences and changes in labour market participation rates (see, e.g., Okun, 1962).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature on Okun´s law at the national is vast. One of the main findings of these papers is that Okun´s coefficient may differ considerably from country to country 6 and may change over time. 7 The main factors behind country differences in (and time variability of) Okun´s coefficients are related to structural differences (changes) in labour markets, such as flexibility and security of employment and unemployment benefits (Balakrishnan et al, 2010; Ball et al, 2013), different phases of economic cycles and economic shocks (Balakrishnan et coefficient) estimate.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is likely a result of these three countries having less regulation on labor markets, allowing companies to lay off workers easier when there is a slowdown in the economy. Cevik et al (2013) examine the presence of asymmetry in Okun's Law for nine transition economies. They find recoveries entail poor job growth in most transition economies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%