1995
DOI: 10.1080/10556799508203253
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Asymmetry in the variability of radio sources towards the centre and anti-centre of the galaxy

Abstract: We report an asymmetry in the distribution of low frequency variable (LFV) radio sources towards the centre-anticentre regions of our galaxy. The study is based on 15 years' monitoring of a large sample of sources observed with Culgoora Array at 80 and 160 MHz. This asymmetry is in marked contrast with the symmetrical distribution of non-variable sources from the same sample. Median values of the corresponding modulation indices on both short and long time scales also show a statistically significant increase … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This paper contained all sources listed in the Culgoora-1, 2 and 3 papers plus additional sources detected in the course of a survey of various Abell clusters of galaxies, and for further ease of access all data were made available in electronic form. In 1995, Slee and two Russian colleagues also investigated the asymmetrical distribution in the centreanticentre region of variable radio sources detected during the Culgoora surveys (Shapirovskaya, Slee and Tsarevsky, 1995).…”
Section: Figure 50mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper contained all sources listed in the Culgoora-1, 2 and 3 papers plus additional sources detected in the course of a survey of various Abell clusters of galaxies, and for further ease of access all data were made available in electronic form. In 1995, Slee and two Russian colleagues also investigated the asymmetrical distribution in the centreanticentre region of variable radio sources detected during the Culgoora surveys (Shapirovskaya, Slee and Tsarevsky, 1995).…”
Section: Figure 50mentioning
confidence: 99%