2010
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.81.014010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Asymmetry observables ine+eπ+πγin theϕregion within a chiral unitar

Abstract: We make a theoretical study of the charge and forward-backward pion asymmetries in the e + e − → π + π − γ process on and off the φ resonance energy. These observables are rather sensitive to the inner details of the theoretical models to describe the reaction. In addition to the standard implementation of the initial state radiation (ISR) and the Bremsstrahlung contribution to the final state radiation (FSR), we use the techniques of the chiral unitary approach to evaluate the contribution from the mechanisms… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
136
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(141 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
5
136
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[4], Ref. [78] shows that this tree-level contribution is nontrivial which is the same weight as the K − p amplitude as found in Ref. [41].…”
Section: The S-/u-channel Contributionssupporting
confidence: 56%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…[4], Ref. [78] shows that this tree-level contribution is nontrivial which is the same weight as the K − p amplitude as found in Ref. [41].…”
Section: The S-/u-channel Contributionssupporting
confidence: 56%
“…4(a), since there would be the contributions from the possible contact term of the tree level in the p wave (see the term of 1) as done in Ref. [78]. Thus, using J ¼ 1=2 sector scattering amplitudes, we obtain the results as shown in Fig.…”
Section: The S-/u-channel Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our result at m π = 266 MeV is close to a ρπ l=0 (m phys π ) ≈ 0.37 fm obtained from Unitarized Effective Field Theory [42], while the corresponding experimental value is not known. However the exact position of the central value for the ground state E 1 in figure 1 with respect to the threshold m ω + m π shows a slight disagreement with the expectation.…”
Section: Jhep04(2014)162mentioning
confidence: 50%