1972
DOI: 10.3758/bf03206257
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Asymmetry of masking between noise and tone

Abstract: A pure tone was used to mask narrow and wide bands of noise centered on the frequency of the tone. In a given experimental session, the sound-pressure level (SPL) of the tone was held constant and loudness balances were obtained between a masked and unmasked noise band of equal width. These results are compared to earlier measures of the partial masking of tone by noise. The comparison shows that noise masks a tone more effectively than the tone masks the noise. Although the effect of the tone on a critical ba… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
45
0
3

Year Published

1984
1984
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
6
45
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…When the signal and masker are centered at the same frequency, the amount of masking is about 20 dB lower than for the TN and TT conditions. This asymmetry of masking has been reported previously and explained by temporal envelope fluctuations introduced by the noise signal ͑e.g., Hellman, 1972;Hall, 1997;Moore et al, 1998;Gockel et al, 2002;. The simulated patterns agree very well with the data, except for signal ͑center͒ frequencies of 500 and 750 Hz at the high masker level, where masking is overestimated by about 10 dB.…”
Section: Spectral Masking Patterns With Narrowband Signals and Massupporting
confidence: 73%
“…When the signal and masker are centered at the same frequency, the amount of masking is about 20 dB lower than for the TN and TT conditions. This asymmetry of masking has been reported previously and explained by temporal envelope fluctuations introduced by the noise signal ͑e.g., Hellman, 1972;Hall, 1997;Moore et al, 1998;Gockel et al, 2002;. The simulated patterns agree very well with the data, except for signal ͑center͒ frequencies of 500 and 750 Hz at the high masker level, where masking is overestimated by about 10 dB.…”
Section: Spectral Masking Patterns With Narrowband Signals and Massupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Depending on the shape of the magnitude spectrum, the presence of certain spectral energy will mask the presence of other spectral energy. Although arbitrary audio spectra may contain complex simultaneous masking scenarios, for the purposes of shaping coding distortions it is convenient to distinguish between only two types of simultaneous masking, namely tone-masking-noise [40], and noise-masking-tone [41]. In the first case, a tone occurring at the center of a critical band masks noise of any subcritical bandwidth or shape, provided the noise spectrum is below a predictable threshold directly related to the strength of the masking tone.…”
Section: Simultaneous Masking and The Spread Of Maskingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Audio fingerprinting must be resilient to all the above distortions without loosing specificity. Several features have been used for audio-fingerprinting purposes, among them, the Mel-frequency Cepstral coefficients (MFCC) [3], [4]; the Spectral Flatness Measure (SFM) [5]; tonality [6] and chroma values [7], most of them are analyzed in depth in [8]. Recently in [9,10] the use of entropy as the sole feature for audio fingerprinting proved to be much more robust to severe degradations outperforming previous approaches.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%