1988
DOI: 10.1016/s0168-8227(88)80016-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Asymptomatic diabetic cardiomyopathy: a noninvasive study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
1
1

Year Published

1990
1990
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
15
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…41 Evidence from clinical and autopsy studies supports the observation that silent manifestations of IHD are more prevalent in persons with than without NIDDM.6-8,42,43 Three prospective population-based studies have found a higher incidence of unrecognized myocardial infarction (defined by major Q waves on resting ECG) in persons with diabetes as compared with those without diabetes although the differences were not statistically significant.36,37'44 '45 The mechanisms underlying painless manifestations of IHD remain unclear.46 In diabetics, decreased cardiac pain perception (as a result of autonomic neuropathy) has been suggested by others and would be compatible with the absence of a significant increase in angina pectoris and resting electrocardiographic abnormalities accompanied by symptoms among persons with NIDDM in this population.7'43'46 Part of the excess of electrocardiographic abnormalities in the absence of symptoms could reflect diabetic cardiomyopathy, the nature of which (atherosclerotic or nonatherosclerotic) remains controversial. 47,48 Recent clinical studies have characterized pathophysiological differences between silent and painful episodes of myocardial ischemia and raised the question whether silent ischemia indicates a functional component of atherosclerotic heart disease, apart from just morphological stenosis of the coronary arteries. 29,46 In this regard, it is interesting that systolic blood pressure but not lipoproteins showed a consistent independent relation with resting electrocardiographic abnormalities suggestive of asymptomatic IHD in this study, as with unrecognized myocardial infarction in previous reports.36'4449 Several previous studies have observed a strong positive association between blood pressure and diabetes mellitus or asymptomatic hyperglycemia but the pathophysiological basis of this coincidence is not completely understood.2'50 There is evidence that cardiac mortality in diabetics increases in the presence of hypertension.47 Whether this might, in part, be because of a synergistic effect of blood pressure and diabetic status on the development of silent IHD deserves further investigation.…”
Section: Relation Of Electrocardiographic Changes With and Without Symentioning
confidence: 99%
“…41 Evidence from clinical and autopsy studies supports the observation that silent manifestations of IHD are more prevalent in persons with than without NIDDM.6-8,42,43 Three prospective population-based studies have found a higher incidence of unrecognized myocardial infarction (defined by major Q waves on resting ECG) in persons with diabetes as compared with those without diabetes although the differences were not statistically significant.36,37'44 '45 The mechanisms underlying painless manifestations of IHD remain unclear.46 In diabetics, decreased cardiac pain perception (as a result of autonomic neuropathy) has been suggested by others and would be compatible with the absence of a significant increase in angina pectoris and resting electrocardiographic abnormalities accompanied by symptoms among persons with NIDDM in this population.7'43'46 Part of the excess of electrocardiographic abnormalities in the absence of symptoms could reflect diabetic cardiomyopathy, the nature of which (atherosclerotic or nonatherosclerotic) remains controversial. 47,48 Recent clinical studies have characterized pathophysiological differences between silent and painful episodes of myocardial ischemia and raised the question whether silent ischemia indicates a functional component of atherosclerotic heart disease, apart from just morphological stenosis of the coronary arteries. 29,46 In this regard, it is interesting that systolic blood pressure but not lipoproteins showed a consistent independent relation with resting electrocardiographic abnormalities suggestive of asymptomatic IHD in this study, as with unrecognized myocardial infarction in previous reports.36'4449 Several previous studies have observed a strong positive association between blood pressure and diabetes mellitus or asymptomatic hyperglycemia but the pathophysiological basis of this coincidence is not completely understood.2'50 There is evidence that cardiac mortality in diabetics increases in the presence of hypertension.47 Whether this might, in part, be because of a synergistic effect of blood pressure and diabetic status on the development of silent IHD deserves further investigation.…”
Section: Relation Of Electrocardiographic Changes With and Without Symentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous studies have reported normal LV systolic function at rest in most type 1 diabetic patients (4), whereas others have suggested increased LV systolic function (5,6). Several investigators have shown abnormal LV diastolic function in the majority of type 1 diabetic patients (7)(8)(9)(10)(11), whereas others (12) found no evidence of LV diastolic dysfunction at rest in longterm type 1 diabetic patients. It has been suggested that LV dysfunction in type 1 diabetic patients may be related to structural changes of the myocardium or to concomitant diabetic autonomic neuropathy (DAN) (13).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was because, as the duration of diabetes increased, other associated comorbid diseases like hypertension, IHD, were also present which were excluded in our study, so the patients with duration of diabetes more than 15 years and above age of 70 years were less. In a study done by Attali et al 12 it was observed that LV diastolic dysfunction was present in patients who were free of cardio vascular disease, had diabetes of less than 5 years.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%