2009
DOI: 10.1090/s0025-5718-09-02318-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Asymptotic analysis of a generalized Richardson extrapolation process on linear sequences

Abstract: Abstract. In this work, we give a detailed convergence and stability analysis for the author's generalized Richardson extrapolation process GREP (m) as this is being applied to linearly convergent or divergent infinite sequences {A n }, whereThe quantity we would like to compute is A, whether it is the limit or antilimit of {A n }. Such sequences arise, for example, as partial sums of power series and of Fourier series of functions that have algebraic and/or logarithmic branch singularities. Specifically, we d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As will become clear, the analysis turns out to be quite involved and nontrivial, and the main results are interesting and nonintuitive. Our results here are analogous to, yet different from, those of Sidi [36] that pertain to the application of the author's generalization of the Richardson extrapolation process GREP (m) to general linear sequences with m > 1. For GREP (m) , see [34,Chapter 4], for example.…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 50%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As will become clear, the analysis turns out to be quite involved and nontrivial, and the main results are interesting and nonintuitive. Our results here are analogous to, yet different from, those of Sidi [36] that pertain to the application of the author's generalization of the Richardson extrapolation process GREP (m) to general linear sequences with m > 1. For GREP (m) , see [34,Chapter 4], for example.…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 50%
“…Comparing Theorems 3.1 and 3.2 of this paper with Theorems 4.1 and 4.2 in [36], we see that they are very similar. Consequently, the implications of both sets of results are the same.…”
Section: Implications Of Theorems 31 and 32mentioning
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation