2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11005-019-01208-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Asymptotic analysis of determinant of discrete Laplacian

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, Finski [14,15] obtained, by a different method, a slightly weaker version of Theorem 1.1 in the case of the square lattice quadrangulations of Riemann surfaces with Neumann boundary conditions and cone angles restricted to integer multiples of π. For other related recent work, see [17,26,27,29,10] Theorem 1.1 above is both sharper and more general than the previous results, and we propose a new, relatively short and elementary proof. The idea is similar to that used by Chinta-Jorgenson-Karlsson [5,6] and Friedli [16] who studied the square lattice Laplacians on a torus: we use an integral representation for log det ∆ Ω δ ,ϕ in terms of theta function and then break the integral into parts that we analyze separately.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 49%
“…Recently, Finski [14,15] obtained, by a different method, a slightly weaker version of Theorem 1.1 in the case of the square lattice quadrangulations of Riemann surfaces with Neumann boundary conditions and cone angles restricted to integer multiples of π. For other related recent work, see [17,26,27,29,10] Theorem 1.1 above is both sharper and more general than the previous results, and we propose a new, relatively short and elementary proof. The idea is similar to that used by Chinta-Jorgenson-Karlsson [5,6] and Friedli [16] who studied the square lattice Laplacians on a torus: we use an integral representation for log det ∆ Ω δ ,ϕ in terms of theta function and then break the integral into parts that we analyze separately.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 49%
“…On the physics side, its importance stems from its role as a partition function of conformal field theories, and in particular, from its conformal transformation properties given by the Polyakov–Alvarez formula [ 2 , 39 , 40 ], see also [ 1 ] and the references therein for the most recent developments. For other related recent work, see [ 12 , 22 , 43 , 44 , 46 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%