2003
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.68.022703
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Asymptotic behavior of the Coulomb three-body scattered wave

Abstract: Asymptotic forms of the scattered wave for a system of three arbitrary charged particles valid in all domains relevant to breakup are derived. The derivations are based on the relationship between the total wave function of a breakup process in a three-body system with Coulomb interactions and the wave function of the process of scattering of all three particles of the system in the continuum. The results are free from amplitude-phase ambiguity problems associated with previously known forms. A similar techniq… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
50
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ionization amplitude T is as defined according to Eq. (1) (see [16,17]) and therefore unambiguous. We emphasize that ⌽ c + , the continuum part of the asymptotic wave function, is valid in all asymptotic domains specified above.…”
Section: ͑22͒mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The ionization amplitude T is as defined according to Eq. (1) (see [16,17]) and therefore unambiguous. We emphasize that ⌽ c + , the continuum part of the asymptotic wave function, is valid in all asymptotic domains specified above.…”
Section: ͑22͒mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We begin by noting that the full ambiguity-free asymptotic form of the total scattering wave function ⌽ + valid in all asymptotic domains as R → ϱ has been given recently [16,17]. In the present paper we ignore the threebody correlation effects.…”
Section: Integral Representation For the Ionization Amplitudementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Peterkop's [4] formulation suffers from the fact that the phase of the ionisation amplitude cannot be uniquely defined, yet a formal solution of the problem must yield a unique amplitude of a specified magnitude and phase. Accordingly these issues have been carefully reanalysed by Kadyrov et al [5] and Kadyrov et al [6]. Briefly, the correct boundary conditions for all kinematical arrangements leading to ionisation have been determined.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%