2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.spa.2010.11.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Asymptotic behavior of unstable INAR(p) processes

Abstract: In this paper the asymptotic behavior of an unstable integer-valued autoregressive model of order p (INAR( p)) is described. Under a natural assumption it is proved that the sequence of appropriately scaled random step functions formed from an unstable INAR( p) process converges weakly towards a squared Bessel process. We note that this limit behavior is quite different from that of familiar unstable autoregressive processes of order p. An application for Boston armed robberies data set is presented.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
71
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
(91 reference statements)
0
71
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, in Ispány and Pap [12, Theorem 3.1], the above result has been prooved under the higher moment assumptions E( is nonnegative for all t ∈ R + with probability one, hence Z + t may be replaced by Z t under the square root in (3.8), see, e.g., Barczy et al [4,Remark 3.3].…”
Section: Preliminaries On 2-type Galton-watson Models With Immigrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In fact, in Ispány and Pap [12, Theorem 3.1], the above result has been prooved under the higher moment assumptions E( is nonnegative for all t ∈ R + with probability one, hence Z + t may be replaced by Z t under the square root in (3.8), see, e.g., Barczy et al [4,Remark 3.3].…”
Section: Preliminaries On 2-type Galton-watson Models With Immigrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By the method of the proof of X (n) D −→ X in Theorem 3.1 in Barczy et al [4], applying Lemma C.2, one can easily derive…”
Section: Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is is the nearly unstable case, and in the unstable case the process loses its stationarity, E(X k ) → ∞ linearly and Theorem 2.2 is no longer valid-see e.g. Barczy, Ispány, and Pap (2011) This case is illustrated by Figure 3, where we can see that a small change in the coefficient can be accompanied by a large change in the innovation without any visible change occurring. In Figure 3 the coefficient and the innovation mean are constant throughout the trajectory.…”
Section: The First-order Case -General Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By continuous mapping theorem (see, e.g., the method of the proof of X (n) D −→ X in Theorem 3.1 in Barczy et al 2011), one can easily derive…”
Section: Theorem 41 Under the Assumptions Of Theorem 31 We Havementioning
confidence: 99%