2017
DOI: 10.3390/risks5020028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Asymptotic Estimates for the One-Year Ruin Probability under Risky Investments

Abstract: Abstract:Motivated by the EU Solvency II Directive, we study the one-year ruin probability of an insurer who makes investments and hence faces both insurance and financial risks. Over a time horizon of one year, the insurance risk is quantified as a nonnegative random variable X equal to the aggregate amount of claims, and the financial risk as a d-dimensional random vector Y consisting of stochastic discount factors of the d financial assets invested. To capture both heavy tails and asymptotic dependence of Y… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 18 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In such a case, we can use also the upper estimate of ruin probability, which usually decreases with increasing initial capital. The useful estimates for the nonhomogeneous models we can find in [27][28][29][30][31] among others. For instance, results of [28,29] imply that ψ(u) c 1 exp{−c 2 u}, u 0, for all above examples with a positive constants c 1 , and c 2 depending on the numerical characteristics of the random claims X, Y and Z, generating a three-risk discrete time model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In such a case, we can use also the upper estimate of ruin probability, which usually decreases with increasing initial capital. The useful estimates for the nonhomogeneous models we can find in [27][28][29][30][31] among others. For instance, results of [28,29] imply that ψ(u) c 1 exp{−c 2 u}, u 0, for all above examples with a positive constants c 1 , and c 2 depending on the numerical characteristics of the random claims X, Y and Z, generating a three-risk discrete time model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%