2011
DOI: 10.1007/s11203-011-9063-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Asymptotic inference of unstable periodic ARCH processes

Abstract: This paper studies asymptotic properties of the quasi maximum likelihood and weighted least squares estimates (QMLE and WLSE) of the conditional variance slope parameters of a strictly unstable ARCH model with periodically time varying coefficients (PARCH in short). The model is strictly unstable in the sense that its parameters lie outside the strict periodic stationarity domain and its boundary. Obtained from the regression form of the PARCH, the WLSE is a variant of the least squares method weighted by the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Aknouche, Al-Eid, and Demouche (2018) generalized the AP-GARCH(1, 1) taking also into account periodicity, thus solving the problems encountered both in the AP-GARCH and the P-GARCH models. In addition, the existing literature on periodic GARCH models generally assumes stationarity of the innovation term, so the periodicity of the model is driven solely by the volatility coefficients (Bollerslev and Ghysels, 1996;Franses and Paap, 2000;Osborn, Savva and Gill, 2008;Aknouche and Bibi, 2009;Aknouche and Al-Eid, 2012;Rossi and Fantazani, 2015;Ziel, Steinert and Husmann, 2015;Ziel, Croonenbroeck and Ambach, 2016). In many applications, this might be a restrictive assumption, when there are seasonal return series that are characterized by timevarying shape marginal distributions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aknouche, Al-Eid, and Demouche (2018) generalized the AP-GARCH(1, 1) taking also into account periodicity, thus solving the problems encountered both in the AP-GARCH and the P-GARCH models. In addition, the existing literature on periodic GARCH models generally assumes stationarity of the innovation term, so the periodicity of the model is driven solely by the volatility coefficients (Bollerslev and Ghysels, 1996;Franses and Paap, 2000;Osborn, Savva and Gill, 2008;Aknouche and Bibi, 2009;Aknouche and Al-Eid, 2012;Rossi and Fantazani, 2015;Ziel, Steinert and Husmann, 2015;Ziel, Croonenbroeck and Ambach, 2016). In many applications, this might be a restrictive assumption, when there are seasonal return series that are characterized by timevarying shape marginal distributions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the 2S-W LSE has the same asymptotic variance as the QM LE. Third, establishing the CAN for a constrained version of the 2S-W LSE outside the strict stationarity domain (Aknouche et al, 2011;Aknouche, 2012;Aknouche and Al-Eid, 2012). Like the QM LE, the constrained 2S-W LSE of an ARCH(1) model is an estimate of the conditional variance slope parameter computed under the constraint that the conditional variance intercept is fixed to any arbitrary known positive value not necessarily the true one.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the framework of GARCH (Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity) models, Rahbek (2004a, 2004b) were the first to establish an asymptotic theory for the quasi-maximum likelihood estimator (QMLE) of nonstationary GARCH(1,1), assuming that the intercept is fixed to an arbitrary value. Aknouche, Al-Eid and Hmeid (2011), Aknouche and Al-Eid (2012) studied the properties of weighted least-squares estimators. Francq and Zakoïan (2012) established the asymptotic properties of the standard QMLE of the complete parameter vector: they showed that, while the intercept cannot be consistently estimated, the QMLE of the remaining parameters is consistent (in the weak sense at the frontier of the stationarity region, and in the strong sense outside) and asymptotically normal with or without strict stationarity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%