2004
DOI: 10.1214/aos/1079120137
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Asymptotic properties of doubly adaptive biased coin designs for multitreatment clinical trials

Abstract: A general doubly adaptive biased coin design is proposed for the allocation of subjects to K treatments in a clinical trial. This design follows the same spirit as Efron's biased coin design and applies to the cases where the desired allocation proportions are unknown, but estimated sequentially. Strong consistency, a law of the iterated logarithm and asymptotic normality of this design are obtained under some widely satisfied conditions. For two treatments, a new family of designs is proposed and shown to be … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
155
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 137 publications
(156 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
155
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among the various classes of response-adaptive design, DBCD, which was first proposed by Eisele, 28 is considered to be superior to many other procedures. 19,29,30 Desirable optimal criteria can be incorporated into the DBCD, and treatment allocations converge to the pre-specified targets. The mechanism to implement treatment randomization with DBCD is given in the following subsection.…”
Section: Response-adaptive Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Among the various classes of response-adaptive design, DBCD, which was first proposed by Eisele, 28 is considered to be superior to many other procedures. 19,29,30 Desirable optimal criteria can be incorporated into the DBCD, and treatment allocations converge to the pre-specified targets. The mechanism to implement treatment randomization with DBCD is given in the following subsection.…”
Section: Response-adaptive Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the treatment allocation procedure in Hu and Zhang, 19 the allocation function for treatment 1 in the second step is where τ0 is a tuning parameter that has a negative association with the level of randomness of the treatment allocation process, with a maximum degree of randomness when τ = 0. The recommended range for τ is between 2 and 4, striking a balance between too much variability (τ<2), which slows the speed for the allocation proportion to converge to the desire allocation target, and too little variability (τ>4), which increases predictability, which could in turn induce an undesirable selection bias.…”
Section: Response-adaptive Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, the choice of an appropriate distance function has not been clear. Hu and Zhang [13] developed an appropriate function, which we now describe.…”
Section: Response-adaptive Randomization Procedures Targeting Optimal Allocationmentioning
confidence: 99%