“…Then Lemma 1 requires that g ik ~2) > 0, g«-» < 0, g (k) > 0, or g {k ' 2) < 0, gu-» > 0, g {k) < 0, on [97, 00) for some 7] > b 9 according as g > 0 or g < 0 on [7], 00). Hence, as before, for any finite subinterval / of [77, 00) there exists N x such that m > N x implies (29) g m >0,g' m >0, ...,^-1} >0 in(6,Q.…”