2017
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.95.106010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Asymptotic solutions in asymptotic safety

Abstract: We explain how to find the asymptotic form of fixed point solutions in functional truncations, in particular f (R) approximations. We find that quantum fluctuations do not decouple at large R, typically leading to elaborate asymptotic solutions containing several free parameters. By a counting argument, these can be used to map out the dimension of the fixed point solution spaces. They are also necessary to validate the numerical solution, and provide the physical arXiv:1704.08873v2 [hep-th]

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
44
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
(163 reference statements)
5
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We observe that in the full solution and in the µ * eff (r) = µ * 0 approximation there are no solutions to the background EoM within the investigated curvature regime. This absence of a constant curvature solution is in agreement with studies of f (R) gravity in the background field approximation [116], although solutions have been found in calculations exploiting the exponential parameterisation [118,119] and within the geometrical approach [43,49]. For the approximation µ * (r) = µ * 0 , which corresponds to a pure Einstein-Hilbert computation, we find a minimum at r 0 = 0.97.…”
Section: B Background Potentialsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…We observe that in the full solution and in the µ * eff (r) = µ * 0 approximation there are no solutions to the background EoM within the investigated curvature regime. This absence of a constant curvature solution is in agreement with studies of f (R) gravity in the background field approximation [116], although solutions have been found in calculations exploiting the exponential parameterisation [118,119] and within the geometrical approach [43,49]. For the approximation µ * (r) = µ * 0 , which corresponds to a pure Einstein-Hilbert computation, we find a minimum at r 0 = 0.97.…”
Section: B Background Potentialsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Note that with a rescaling of our unique cutoff scale in Sec. VI with N 2 c we already arrive at the N c independent fixed point values (62). The large values come from dropping the N c -independent prefactor in the ratio G=G eff .…”
Section: Uv Dominance Of Gravity a Dynamical Scale Fixingmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…and vanish in the large N c scaling of (62). It is simple to show that the further diagrams in the fixed point equations of w 2 , v 2 proportional to w 2 , v 2 decay even faster when using (67) for the diagrams.…”
Section: Decoupling Of Gravity-induced Gluon Self-interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(3) While it is straightforward to solve the RG equations numerically, there exists a conve- 5 We refer the reader to [23][24][25][26][27][28] for a partial list of recent results. nient analytical approximation for Type IIIa trajectories which leads to transparent closedform results often.…”
Section: The Einstein-hilbert Examplementioning
confidence: 99%