In this paper, the problem of wideband radar cross section (RCS) calculations with asymptotic waveform evaluation (AWE) accelerated method of moments is considered. The traditional formulation, with RCS obtained independently for each frequency, based on Padé approximation of the current distribution is compared to the formulation where rational functions are used to directly approximate far fields. It is shown that an additional approximation used in the second attitude, may reduce the resulting bandwidth of the model.
Keywords-Radar cross section, moment method, asymptotic waveform evaluation. I. INTRODUCTION The asymptotic waveform evaluation (AWE) is a powerful tool for speeding-up wideband calculations in computational electromagnetics [1], [2]. Apart of other applications, it has been successfully used in conjunction with the integral-equations/method-of-moments (IE/MoM) method for wideband calculation of scattered fields. Applications include scattering by perfect electric conductor (PEC) objects [3], homogeneous dielectric bodies [4], and inhomogeneous dielectric bodies of revolution [5].The usual way of performing calculations of radar cross section (RCS) data using AWE, is based on looking for the approximation of the source (current) distribution in the given frequency interval. For each particular frequency point, the RCS is then computed independently, using known current distribution for this frequency. Here, we investigate another possibility, consisting of obtaining also approximations for the far-field operators.In order to compare different attitudes, we perform example calculation of the RCS of a layered dielectric sphere using volume integral equation (VIE) formulation developed by the author for bodies with rotational symmetry [5].The rest of this paper is organized as follows. First, the essentials of AWE method are outlined, with emphasis on calculation of secondary parameters from the approximate solution. Then we introduce example formulation for scattering by dielectric inhomogeneous bodies of revolution (BOR), and finally results of direct and approximate methods of RCS calculations are compared.