2001
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-44503-x_10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Asymptotically Optimal Declustering Schemes for Range Queries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…it is the maximum number of tiles in Q retrieved from a single disk). These schemes include Disk Modulo DM [6], Fieldwise eXclusive (FX) or [9], the cyclic schemes (including RPHM, GFIB, and EXH) [11], GRS [4], a technique developed by Atallah and Prabhakar [2] which we will call RFX, and several techniques based on discrepancy theory [5,14] (for an introduction to discrepancy theory see [10]). Note that these are just a subset of the declustering techniques that have been developed for this problem.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…it is the maximum number of tiles in Q retrieved from a single disk). These schemes include Disk Modulo DM [6], Fieldwise eXclusive (FX) or [9], the cyclic schemes (including RPHM, GFIB, and EXH) [11], GRS [4], a technique developed by Atallah and Prabhakar [2] which we will call RFX, and several techniques based on discrepancy theory [5,14] (for an introduction to discrepancy theory see [10]). Note that these are just a subset of the declustering techniques that have been developed for this problem.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A scheme based on the Corput set is defined in [14] that is similar to GRS except that the k i values are…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Given the established bounds on the extra cost and the impossibility result, a large number of declustering techniques have been proposed to achieve performance close to the bounds either on the average case [5], [12], [13], [14], [16], [22], [24], [25], [29], [31], [36], [37] or, in the worst case, [3], [6], [7], [9], [41]. Although initial approaches in the literature were originally for relational databases or Cartesian product files, recent techniques focus more on spatial data declustering.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%