2018
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3287099
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Asymptotics for Small Nonlinear Price Impact: A PDE Homogenization Approach to the Multidimensional Case

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The expansion provided in this paper allows one to compute the price impact coefficient in the option's market (which is hard to measure directly, due to the lack of liquidity and/or transparency) in terms of the price impact coefficient 𝜂 in the underlying market (which is easier to measure directly), assuming the latter is small-this connection is given explicitly by equation (71). Unlike the existing literature (Bayraktar et al, 2018;Bichuch & Shreve, 2013;Caye et al, 2018;Ekren & Muhle-Karbe, 2019;Guasoni & Weber, 2015;Kallsen & Muhle-Karbe, 2015;Moreau et al, 2017;Possamai et al, 2015), where the authors obtain expansions for the value function of the optimal hedging problem, to obtain the small impact expansion of the indifference price we need to expand a partial derivative of the value function. As the existing methods are not sufficient to obtain such an expansion, we employ a more direct approach that relies on the properties of the optimal control and on the stochastic representations of the derivatives of the value function, established in the preceding part of the paper.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The expansion provided in this paper allows one to compute the price impact coefficient in the option's market (which is hard to measure directly, due to the lack of liquidity and/or transparency) in terms of the price impact coefficient 𝜂 in the underlying market (which is easier to measure directly), assuming the latter is small-this connection is given explicitly by equation (71). Unlike the existing literature (Bayraktar et al, 2018;Bichuch & Shreve, 2013;Caye et al, 2018;Ekren & Muhle-Karbe, 2019;Guasoni & Weber, 2015;Kallsen & Muhle-Karbe, 2015;Moreau et al, 2017;Possamai et al, 2015), where the authors obtain expansions for the value function of the optimal hedging problem, to obtain the small impact expansion of the indifference price we need to expand a partial derivative of the value function. As the existing methods are not sufficient to obtain such an expansion, we employ a more direct approach that relies on the properties of the optimal control and on the stochastic representations of the derivatives of the value function, established in the preceding part of the paper.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that, in this regime, the function 𝑚 is large and, thanks to (B.2), the process (𝜋 * + 𝑄𝜕 𝑠 𝑃), which is the optimally controlled deviation from the frictionless hedge 𝑄𝜕 𝑠 𝑃 𝑡 , is strongly mean reverting around zero. The process (𝜋 * 𝑡 + 𝑄𝜕 𝑠 𝑃 𝑡 )∕𝜂 1∕4 is, in fact, the so called fast variable mentioned in (Bayraktar et al, 2018;Moreau et al, 2017;Soner & Touzi, 2013). However, unlike the latter papers, herein we do not use the viscosity solution methods to characterize the limiting behavior of (𝜋 * 𝑡 + 𝑄𝜕 𝑠 𝑃 𝑡 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Now we would like to show the boundedness of g , which follows the same idea as [8]. Since g is odd, we only need to show that for x > 0, g is bounded from below.…”
Section: A Proof Of Lemma 33mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Portfolio choice problems for the most tractable specification G(x) = λx 2 /2, λ > 0 are analyzed in singleagent models by [22,3,42,26]; equilibrium returns are determined in [22,43,9]. In [27,14,8], single-agent models are solved for the more general power costs G(x) = λ|x| q /q, q ∈ (1, 2] proposed by [1]. Below, we will determine equilibrium returns for general smooth convex cost functions G as studied in the duality theory of [25]: (ii) The derivative G is also strictly increasing and differentiable on (0, ∞) with G (0) = 0;…”
Section: Costs and Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2018). In Guasoni and Weber (2020); Cayé, Herdegen, and Muhle‐Karbe (2020); Bayraktar, Cayé, and Ekren (2020), single‐agent models are solved for the more general power costs Gfalse(xfalse)=λ|x|q/q, q(1,2] proposed by Almgren (2003).…”
Section: Equilibrium With Costs On the Trading Ratementioning
confidence: 99%