2019
DOI: 10.4103/ijabmr.ijabmr_260_18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Asynchronous versus traditional teaching for MBBS undergraduate students-effectiveness and students perspectives - A pilot study

Abstract: Background: Traditional lectures continue to be one of the common ways of teaching practiced in medical schools across India. However, there are many other effective ways of teaching in large groups and lately e-learning modules, which can be synchronous, asynchronous, or blended, have been used to complement face-to-face interactions. E-assignments have been effectively used to engage students into meaningful learning. Aim: The aim of the study is to compare asynchrono… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results indicated that the students have varied views on the blended learning system. Chauhan et al (2019) also concluded that traditional lectures followed by e‐learning modules can be complementary to the lectures and help in fulfilling the knowledge gaps. It is also reported that other factors such as emotional and affective should be taken into account, while integrating blended learning into the medical education curriculum (Ruiz et al, 2006; Shahoumianet et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results indicated that the students have varied views on the blended learning system. Chauhan et al (2019) also concluded that traditional lectures followed by e‐learning modules can be complementary to the lectures and help in fulfilling the knowledge gaps. It is also reported that other factors such as emotional and affective should be taken into account, while integrating blended learning into the medical education curriculum (Ruiz et al, 2006; Shahoumianet et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Online asynchronous learning opportunities, where content can be accessed on-demand, have become increasingly popular across disciplines, especially following the transition of many education systems to remote learning due to COVID-19 (Brady & Pradhan, 2020; Cook et al, 2008). Research in health care suggests that there are some potential benefits to asynchronous online learning, including preference for the modality, flexibility, cost-effectiveness, and increase in knowledge acquisition (Branzetti et al, 2011; Burnette et al, 2009; Chauhan et al, 2019; Jordan et al, 2013; Lew & Nordquist, 2016). It is important to conceptualize these findings with attention to differences in other indices of training compared with synchronous training (Lew & Nordquist, 2016; Mallonee et al, 2018).…”
Section: Asynchronous Online Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…103 Similarly, when comparing these methods in Bachelor of Medicine and Bachelor of Surgery undergraduate students, there was no significant difference in post-test scores between the two groups (P = .507). 106 A novel approach blending the two methods is a "flipped classroom." In this model, students watch prerecorded lectures before class and the class time is reserved for discussion and problem-solving of relevant topics.…”
Section: Asynchronous Vs Synchronous Deliverymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It allows for immediate clarification of concepts and extension of knowledge, 102,105 which has been found to be important for learners with limited exposure and higher difficulty perception of subjects. 106 Research has shown that active learning can increase lecture attendance, engagement, and acquisition of expert attitudes toward the discipline of choice. 107 In a study of students enrolled in science, engineering, and mathematics courses, students involved in active learning had an increase in exam performance, concept inventories, and other assessments.…”
Section: Asynchronous Vs Synchronous Deliverymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation