“…Besides the effect of alcohol consumption (e.g., Abbey, Buck, Zawacki, & Saenz, 2003) and prevention programs (e.g., Foubert & Perry, 2007), few studies have examined the construction of attitudes regarding sexual aggression as part of an interactional process subject to change in response to contextual or situational forces. Given the lack of information about processes shaping the formation of attitudes about date rape and sexual coercion, and recent literature that suggests men who harm women might do so when their sense of masculinity is threatened (Atkinson, Greenstein, & Lang, 2005;Maass, Cadinu, Guarnieri, & Grasselli, 2003;Macmillan & Gartner, 1999;Messerschmidt, 2000;Perlata, Tuttle, & Steele, 2010), we conducted an experiment to evaluate the claim that threatened gender identity affects individuals' views of heterosexual male-on-female sexual aggression. Based on social identity theory (Hogg, 1992;Hogg & Abrams, 1988;Tajfel & Turner, 1979), we anticipate that gender identity threats will lead men to view female victims as more responsible in these settings, while women will view male perpetrators as more responsible.…”