1986
DOI: 10.1088/0031-9120/21/3/307
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

At what stage should energy be taught?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
1
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
14
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The findings presented here corroborate Warren's (1986) assertion that an understanding of the scientific energy concept requires abstract reasoning, but does not suggest that we embrace his conclusion that the energy concept should not be taught before abstract reasoning is attained. Rather, it suggests that the energy concept is constructed through a hierarchical sequence of increasingly adequate conceptions, beginning with observations about the behavior of moving objects in the everyday world.…”
Section: Developing Conceptions Of Energy 28contrasting
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The findings presented here corroborate Warren's (1986) assertion that an understanding of the scientific energy concept requires abstract reasoning, but does not suggest that we embrace his conclusion that the energy concept should not be taught before abstract reasoning is attained. Rather, it suggests that the energy concept is constructed through a hierarchical sequence of increasingly adequate conceptions, beginning with observations about the behavior of moving objects in the everyday world.…”
Section: Developing Conceptions Of Energy 28contrasting
confidence: 70%
“…Given these difficulties, Warren (1986) has gone so far as to argue that the energy concept should not be taught at all until high school, when students are able to reason abstractly. Trumper's (1993) observation that adequate energy conceptions were associated with formal operations seems to support this view.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This concern has been well articulated in several analyses [24,[41][42][43]. Feynman states that energy is ''not a description of a mechanism, or anything concrete'' [22].…”
Section: B Concerns About a Substance Ontology For Energymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…What are seen by Duit as minor limitations to be addressed pedagogically as unproductive aspects of an analogy are, to Warren [1982Warren [ , 1986, an unacceptable corruption of the inherently abstract, mathematical nature of the scientific concept of energy. This substance-like understanding of energy is strikingly at odds with the abstract, mathematical concept as described by Feynman, leading Warren [1982 to suggest that the concept should not be taught at the elementary level.…”
Section: Science Education Research On Learning and Teaching The Concmentioning
confidence: 99%