The Protective Arm of the Renin Angiotensin System (RAS) 2015
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-801364-9.00015-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

AT2R and Sympathetic Outflow

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared to that discussing the role of AT 2 R in Na + excretion, literature describing the effect of AT 2 R on the K + channel is limited only to neuronal cells 3 and the renal outer medullary K + channel 4 in the cortical collecting duct. Wu et al 5 reported important and relevant information in the field of AT 2 R and K + excretion through a patch-clamp and renal clearance study published in the current issue of Hypertension .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Compared to that discussing the role of AT 2 R in Na + excretion, literature describing the effect of AT 2 R on the K + channel is limited only to neuronal cells 3 and the renal outer medullary K + channel 4 in the cortical collecting duct. Wu et al 5 reported important and relevant information in the field of AT 2 R and K + excretion through a patch-clamp and renal clearance study published in the current issue of Hypertension .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They showed that AT 2 R activation by the AT 2 R agonist, CGP42112a, inhibited the activity of the basolateral 40-pS K + channel (a Kir4.1/Kir5.1 heteromer) in the DCT (Fig.1), and the AT 2 R antagonist, PD123319, stimulated the activity of this K + channel. The inhibitory effect of AT 2 R on the K + channel activity would be definite if the CGP42112a response was blocked by PD123319 or by an inhibitor of Src homology region 2 domain-containing phosphatase-1 (SHP-1), which is a downstream signaling component of AT 2 R. Furthermore, ang-II inhibited the K + channel only when AT 1 R was blocked, 3 although it is surprising that ang-II alone had no effect on the channel activity. Another study 6 performed on the thick ascending limb revealed that there was no effect of ang-II on the 50-pS K + channel activity while AT 1 R was blocked with losartan.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%