Volume 5: Manufacturing Materials and Metallurgy; Ceramics; Structures and Dynamics; Controls, Diagnostics and Instrumentation; 1996
DOI: 10.1115/96-gt-194
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ATEC: The Aerodynamic Turbine Engine Code for the Analysis of Transient and Dynamic Gas Turbine Engine System Operations: Part 2 — Numerical Simulations

Abstract: A new one-dimensional, time dependent aerothermodynamic mathematical model and computer simulation of the gas turbine engine has been developed. The Aerodynamic Turbine Engine Code (ATEC) simulates the operation of the gas turbine engine by solving conservation equations, expressed as one dimensional, time dependent Euler equations, with turbomachinery source terms. Development of the mathematical models were discussed in Part 1. Part 2 presents the results of exercising the simulation for several different pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As far as solution of non-linear partial differential equation (PDEs) and ordinary differential equations (ODEs) involved in the physical models are concerned, a proper numerical technique is required to convert them into a linearized equation for simulation purposes. Various numerical methodologies such as the Newton–Raphson Method [ 7 , 10 , 12 , 45 , 71 , 73 , 110 ], Runge–Kutta method [ 66 , 73 , 74 , 118 ], Taylor series [ 119 ], Euler implicit and explicit numerical solution method [ 118 , 120 ], finite difference method (FDM) [ 52 , 66 , 110 , 121 ], linear interpolation method [ 74 ], and trapezoidal rule [ 66 , 122 ] have been purposed and utilized by the researchers. However, each method has its own benefits and limitation depending upon the complexity of the mathematical equations involved in transient models.…”
Section: Methods and Techniques For Transient Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As far as solution of non-linear partial differential equation (PDEs) and ordinary differential equations (ODEs) involved in the physical models are concerned, a proper numerical technique is required to convert them into a linearized equation for simulation purposes. Various numerical methodologies such as the Newton–Raphson Method [ 7 , 10 , 12 , 45 , 71 , 73 , 110 ], Runge–Kutta method [ 66 , 73 , 74 , 118 ], Taylor series [ 119 ], Euler implicit and explicit numerical solution method [ 118 , 120 ], finite difference method (FDM) [ 52 , 66 , 110 , 121 ], linear interpolation method [ 74 ], and trapezoidal rule [ 66 , 122 ] have been purposed and utilized by the researchers. However, each method has its own benefits and limitation depending upon the complexity of the mathematical equations involved in transient models.…”
Section: Methods and Techniques For Transient Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This level of modeling fidelity for the key engine components of the propulsion system will allow for accurate representation of the thrust dynamics. Integrated propulsion system one-dimensional dynamic models have been developed in support of previous NASA supersonic projects by Garrard, [14][15][16] Gamble, 17 Numbers, 18 and Giannola. 19 The distinction in the work presented here is that the main goal is to provide a platform for integration into a high fidelity ASE vehicle model.…”
Section: B Propulsion System Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…or one-dimensional [2,3], are often based upon single-stage or full characteristic maps of the turbomachine. These maps are often inaccurate or simply not available, and their use is not compatible with the exploratory aspect of the simulation [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%