ATHENA detector proposal — a totally hermetic electron nucleus apparatus proposed for IP6 at the Electron-Ion Collider

Adam, J.; Adamczyk, L.; Agrawal, N.; Aidala, C.; Akers, W.; Alekseev, M.; Allen, M.M.; Ameli, F.; Angerami, A.; Antonioli, P.; Apadula, N.; Aprahamian, A.; Armstrong, W.; Arratia, M.; Arrington, J.; Asaturyan, A.; Aschenauer, E. C.; Augsten, K.; Aune, S.; Bailey, K. Alysse; Baldanza, C.; Bansal, M.; Barbosa, Fernando; Barion, L.; Barish, K. N.; Battaglieri, M.; Bazilevsky, A.; Behera, N. K.; Бердников, В. В.; Bernauer, J. C.; Berriaud, Christophe; Bhasin, A.; Bhattacharya, Deb Sankar; Bielčík, J.; Bielčíková, J.; Bissolotti, Chiara; Boeglin, W.; Bondí, M.; Borri, M.; Bossù, F.; Bouyjou, F.; Brandenburg, J. D.; Bressan, A.; Brooks, M. L.; Bültmann, S.; Byer, Duane; Caines, H.; Sánchez, M. Calderón De La Barca; Calvelli, V.; Camsonne, A.; Cappelli, Laura; Capua, M.; Castro, M.; Cavazza, D.; Cebra, D.; Celentano, A.; Chakaberia, I.; Chan, B. K.; Chang, W.; Chartier, M.; Chatterjee, C.; Chen, D.; Chen, J.; Chen, K.; Chen, Z.; H., Chetri,; Chiarusi, T.; Chiosso, M.; Chu, X.; Chwastowski, J. J.; Cicala, G.; Cisbani, E.; Cline, E.; Cloët, Ian C.; Colella, D.; Contalbrigo, M.; Contin, G.; Corliss, R.; Corrales-Morales, Y.; Crafts, J.; Crawford, Chris; Cruz-Torres, R.; D’Ago, D.; D’Angelo, A.; d’Hose, N.; Dainton, J. B.; Torre, S. Dalla; Dasgupta, S.; Dash, S.; Dashyan, N.; Datta, J.; Daugherity, M.; Vita, R. De; Deconinck, W.; Defurne, M.; Dehmelt, K.; Dotto, Alessio Del; Delcarro, Filippo; Dellacasa, G.; Demiroglu, Z. S.; Deptuch, G.; Desai, Vaishnavi; Deshpande, A.; Devereaux, K.; Dhillon, R.; Salvo, R. Di; Dilks, C.; Dixit, Dhruv Utpalkumar; Dobbs, S.; Dong, X.; Drachenberg, J. L.; Drees, A.; Dupré, R.; Durham, M.; Dzhygadlo, R.; Fassi, L. El; Elia, D.; Epple, E.; Esha, R.; Evdokimov, O.; Eyser, O.; Falchieri, D.; Fan, W.; Fantini, A.; Fatemi, R.; Fazio, S.; Fegan, S.; Filippi, A.; Fox, H.; Francisco, A.; Freeze, A.; Furletov, S.; Furletova, Y.; Gal, C.; Gardner, Stephanie; Garg, P.; Gaskell, D.; Gates, K.; Gericke, Michael; Geurts, F. J. M.; Ghosh, Chandan; Giacalone, Marco; Giacomini, F; S., Gilchrist,; Glazier, D. I.; Gnanvo, K.; Gonella, L.; Greiner, L.; Guerrini, N.; Guo, L.; Gupta, A.; Gupta, R.; Guryn, W.; He, X.; Hemmick, T. K.; Heppelmann, S.; Higinbotham, D. W.; Hoballah, Malak; Hoghmrtsyan, A.; Hohlmann, M.; Horn, T.; Hornidge, D.; Huang, H. Z.; Hyde, Charles; P., Iapozzuto,; Idzik, M.; Jacak, B.; Jadhav, M. B.; Jain, Sh.; Jena, C.; Jentsch, A.; Ji, Y.; Ji, Z.; Jia, J.; Jones, P. G.; Jones, R.W.I.; Joosten, S.; Joshi, Shachi; Kabir, Latiful; Kalicy, G.; Karyan, G.; Kashyap, Varchaswi; Kawall, D.; Ke, H. W.; Kelsey, M.; Kim, J.; Kiryluk, J.; Kiselev, A.; Klein, S. R.; Klest, H. T.; Kochar, V.; Korsch, W.; Kosarzewski, L. K.; Kotzinian, A.M.; Křížek, F.; Kumar, Ashok; Kumar, Karan; Kumar, L.; Kumar, R.; Kumar, S.; Kunnath, A.; Nilay, Kushawaha,; Lacey, R.; Lai, Yue Shi; Lalwani, K.; Landgraf, J. M.; Lanza, L.; Lattuada, D.; Lavinsky, M.; Lee, J.H.; Lee, S.H.; Lemmon, R. C.; A., Lestone,; Lewis, N. A.; Li, H.; S., Li,; Li, W.; Li, W.; Li, X.; Li, X.; Liang, X.; Ligonzo, T.; Lin, T. H.; Liu, J.; Liu, K.; Liu, M.; Livingston, K.; Liyanage, N.; Ljubičić, T.; Long, O. R.; Lukow, N. S.; Ma, Y.; Mammei, J.; Mammoliti, F.; Mamo, Kiminad A.; Mandjavidze, I.; S., Maple,; Marchand, D.; Margotti, A.; Markert, C.; Markowitz, P.; Marshall, T.; Martin, A.; Marukyan, H.; Mastroserio, A.; Mathew, S.; Mayilyan, S.; C., Mayri,; McEneaney, Matthew; Mei, Y.; Meng, L.; Méot, F.; Metcalfe, J.; Meziani, Zein‐Eddine; P., Mihir,; Ryan, Milton,; A., Mirabella,; Mirazita, M.; Mkrtchyan, A.; Mkrtchyan, H.; Mohanty, B.; Mondal, M. M.; Morreale, A.; Movsisyan, A.; Muenstermann, D.; Mukherjee, Asmita; Camacho, C. Muñoz; Murray, M.; H., Mustafa,; Myška, M.; Nachman, B. P.; Nagai, K.; Naik, R.; Naim, J.P.; Nam, J. D.; Nandi, B. K.; Nappi, E.; Nasim, Md.; Neff, D.; Neiret, D.; Newman, P. R.; Nguyen, M.; Niccolai, S.; Nie, M.; Noferini, F.; Norman, J.; Noto, F.; Nunes, A. S.; O’Connor, Timothy E.; Odyniec, G.; Okorokov, V.; Osipenko, M.; Page, B. S.; Palatchi, C.; Palmer, David T.; Palni, P.; Pandey, S.; Panzieri, D.; Park, S.; Paschke, K.; Pastore, C.; Patra, Rajendra Nath; Paul, Arpon; Paul, S.; Pecar, C.; A., Peck,; Pegg, Ian L.; Pellegrino, C.; Peng, C.; Pentchev, L.; Perrino, R.; Piotrzkowski, K.; Polakovic, Tomas; Płoskoń, M.; Posik, M.; Prasad, Sidharth Kumar; Preghenella, R.; Priens, S.; Prifti, Enea; Przybycień, M.; Pujahari, P. R.; Quintero, A.; Radici, Marco; Radhakrishnan, S. K.; Rahman, Syeda; Rathi, S.; Raue, B. A.; Reed, R.; Reimer, P.; Reinhold, J.; Renner, Elisabeth; Rignanese, L. P.; Ripani, M.; Rizzo, A.; Romanov, Dmitry; Roy, A.; Rubini, Nicola; Ruspa, M.; Ruan, L.; Sabatié, F.; Sadhukhan, S.; Sahoo, N.; Sahu, P. K.; Samuel, D.; Sarkar, A.; Sarsour, M.; Schmidke, W. B.; Schmookler, Barak; Schwarz, C.; Schwiening, J.; Scott, M. B. C.; Sedgwick, I.; Segreti, M.; Sekula, S. J.; Seto, R.; Shah, N.; Shahinyan, A.; Sharma, D.; Sharma, N.; Sichtermann, E. P.; Signori, Andrea; Singh, A.; Singh, B. K.; Singh, Shubham; Smirnov, N.; Sokhan, D.; Soltz, R. A.; Sondheim, W. E.; Spinali, Sebastiano; F., Stacchi,; Staszewski, R.; Stepanov, P.Yu.; Strazzi, Sofia; Stroe, Izabela; Sun, X.; Surrow, B.; Sweger, Z. W.; Symons, T. J. M.; Tadevosyan, V.; Tang, A. H.; Tassi, E.; Teodorescu, L.; Tessarotto, F.; Thomas, D.; Thomas, J. H.; Toll, T.; Tomášek, L.; Torales-Acosta, F.; Tribedy, P.; Triloki,; Tripathi, V. K.; Trotta, R.; Trzebiński, M.; Trzeciak, B. A.; Tsai, O. D.; Tu, Z.; Turrisi, R.; Tuvé, C.; Ullrich, T.; Urciuoli, G. M.; Valentini, A.; Vallarino, S.; Vandenbroucke, M.; Vaněk, J.; Vino, G.; Volpe, G.; Voskanyan, H.; Vossen, A.; Voutier, E.; Wang, G.; Wang, Y.; Watts, D. P.; Wickramaarachchi, N.; Wilson, F. F.; Wong, Cheuk-Ping; Wu, Xundong; Wu, Y.; Xie, Junqi; Xu, Q.; Xu, Z.W.; Yang, C.; Yang, Q.; Yang, Yi-Bo; Ye, Z.; Ye, Z.; Yi, L.; Yin, Z.; Yurov, M.; Zachariou, N.; Zhang, J.; Y., Zhang,; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Zhao, Y. X.; Zhao, Zhiwen; Zheng, Liang; Żurek, M.

doi:10.1088/1748-0221/17/10/p10019

Cited by 23 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 106 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…3. Momentum resolutions versus momentum for the ATHENA setup corresponding to simulated pions-uniform in η momentum compared to the physics requirements in YR for selected η bins [7].…”

Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Tracking performance studies for the Experimental Setup at the Electron-Ion Collider

Kumar

Mastroserio²,

Elia³

2022

EPJ Web Conf.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The US Electron-Ion Collider (EIC) is a future facility to be built at the Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL) to study the collisions of polarized electrons with polarized protons and ions. It will provide the answers to fundamental questions on quark and gluon interactions such as: how colored partons and colorless jets travel in the nuclear medium, the properties of the state of matter in high gluon density (low-x) regime, distribution of quarks, gluons, and their spin inside a nucleon. EIC is expected to run at the luminosity of 1032-1034 cm-2 sec-1 and center-of-mass energy 20-140 GeV [1]. ATHENA (A Totally Hermetic Electron Nucleus Apparatus) is one of the detector designs provided as the response to the call for the proposal issued by the EIC Project in 2021. It consists of a tracking system with wide pseudorapidity coverage (|η|<3.5), high granularity (pixel size of inner layers ~10 μm), and low material budget (0.05% of X0 per layer) for the innermost silicon layers to achieve good tracking and vertexing performances.

show abstract

“…3. Momentum resolutions versus momentum for the ATHENA setup corresponding to simulated pions-uniform in η momentum compared to the physics requirements in YR for selected η bins [7].…”

Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…D 0 meson (cτ= 123 µm). In this paper, we present the study of tracking performances of the ATHENA detector [7] in eachηbin and compare them with the requirements dictated by the physics goals of the experiment.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Tracking performance studies for the Experimental Setup at the Electron-Ion Collider

Kumar

Mastroserio²,

Elia³

2022

EPJ Web Conf.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The ECAL employs tungsten-powder/scintillating fiber technology [26,27], following the design outlined in ref. [28]. Its towers have an area of 2.5 × 2.5 cm 2 , it is 17 cm deep (22 𝑋 0 , 1 𝜆 𝑛 ), and lacks longitudinal segmentation.…”

Section: Simulationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The optimal use of segmentation for sampling calorimeters

Torales Acosta,

Karki,

Karande

et al. 2024

J. Inst.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

One of the key design choices of any sampling calorimeter is how fine to make the longitudinal and transverse segmentation. To inform this choice, we study the impact of calorimeter segmentation on energy reconstruction. To ensure that the trends are due entirely to hardware and not to a sub-optimal use of segmentation, we deploy deep neural networks to perform the reconstruction. These networks make use of all available information by representing the calorimeter as a point cloud. To demonstrate our approach, we simulate a detector similar to the forward calorimeter system intended for use in the ePIC detector, which will operate at the upcoming Electron Ion Collider. We find that for the energy estimation of isolated charged pion showers, relatively fine longitudinal segmentation is key to achieving an energy resolution that is better than 10% across the full phase space. These results provide a valuable benchmark for ongoing EIC detector optimizations and may also inform future studies involving high-granularity calorimeters in other experiments at various facilities.

show abstract

“…• The calorimeter design can be changed to try alternatives, including the original EIC Generic calorimeter model [1], a model similar to that proposed for the ATHENA detector concept [16], and a model similar to the CMS calorimeter adopted in Ref. [4].…”

Section: Jet Reconstruction In Detector Modelmentioning

confidence: 99%

Higgs Production and $H^0 \to c\overline{c}$ at a Future Muon-Ion Collider

Ahluwalia¹,

Choi²,

Masters³

et al. 2022

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We investigate the production of Higgs bosons in neutral-and charged-current interactions at a future Muon-Ion Collider (MuIC) with emphasis on H 0 → cc decay. In particular, we focus on the leading production mechanisms and explore the impact of a range of Parton Distribution Function (PDF) scenarios, with emphasis on the role of heavy intrinsic quark flavor. We emphasize estimates of non-resonant di-charm background production and explore the impact of this background on a possible future measurement of H 0 → cc at a future Muon-Ion Collider facility.

show abstract

ATHENA detector proposal — a totally hermetic electron nucleus apparatus proposed for IP6 at the Electron-Ion Collider

Cited by 23 publications

References 106 publications

Tracking performance studies for the Experimental Setup at the Electron-Ion Collider

Tracking performance studies for the Experimental Setup at the Electron-Ion Collider

The optimal use of segmentation for sampling calorimeters

Higgs Production and $H^0 \to c\overline{c}$ at a Future Muon-Ion Collider

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About