Abstract. The purpose of this study is to investigate the ability of the Sentinel-5P
TROPOspheric Monitoring Instrument (TROPOMI) to derive accurate geometrical
features of lofted aerosol layers, selecting the Mediterranean
Basin as the study area. Comparisons with ground-based correlative measurements constitute a
key component in the validation of passive and active satellite aerosol
products. For this purpose, we use ground-based observations from quality-controlled lidar stations reporting to the European Aerosol Research Lidar
Network (EARLINET). An optimal methodology for validation purposes has been
developed and applied using the EARLINET optical profiles and TROPOMI
aerosol products, aiming at the in-depth evaluation of the TROPOMI aerosol
layer height (ALH) product for the period 2018 to 2022 over the
Mediterranean Basin. Seven EARLINET stations were chosen, taking into
consideration their proximity to the sea, which provided 63 coincident
aerosol cases for the satellite retrievals. In the following, we present the
first validation results for the TROPOMI/S5P ALH using the optimized
EARLINET lidar products employing the automated validation chain designed
for this purpose. The quantitative validation at pixels over the selected
EARLINET stations illustrates that the TROPOMI ALH product is consistent with
the EARLINET lidar products, with a high correlation coefficient R=0.82
(R=0.51) and a mean bias of -0.51±0.77 km and -2.27±1.17 km
over ocean and land, respectively. Overall, it appears that aerosol layer
altitudes retrieved from TROPOMI are systematically lower than altitudes
from the lidar retrievals. High-albedo scenes, as well as low-aerosol-load
scenes, are the most challenging for the TROPOMI retrieval algorithm, and
these results testify to the need to further investigate the underlying
cause. This work provides a clear indication that the TROPOMI ALH product
can under certain conditions achieve the required threshold accuracy and precision
requirements of 1 km, especially when only ocean pixels are included in the
comparison analysis. Furthermore, we describe and analyse three case studies
in detail, one dust and two smoke episodes, in order to illustrate the
strengths and limitations of the TROPOMI ALH product and demonstrate the
presented validation methodology. The present analysis provides important
additions to the existing validation studies that have been performed so far
for the TROPOMI S5P ALH product, which were based only on
satellite-to-satellite comparisons.