2020
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2012.10533
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Atlas-ISTN: Joint Segmentation, Registration and Atlas Construction with Image-and-Spatial Transformer Networks

Abstract: Deep learning models for semantic segmentation are able to learn powerful representations for pixel-wise predictions, but are sensitive to noise at test time and do not guarantee a plausible topology. Image registration models on the other hand are able to warp known topologies to target images as a means of segmentation, but typically require large amounts of training data, and have not widely been benchmarked against pixel-wise segmentation models. We propose Atlas-ISTN, a framework that jointly learns segme… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
(134 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Evan et al [18] proposed to learn a deformation map that warps a pre-specified atlas conditioned on subject-specific characteristics. Sinclair et al [43] proposed Atlas-ISTN, a deep-learning framework to jointly learn segmentation, registration and atlas construction. However, these approaches do not consider a pairwise image alignment loss to improve registration accuracy and their evaluation approaches require the annotation of the built atlas thus is not a measurement that can be easily compared among approaches.…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Evan et al [18] proposed to learn a deformation map that warps a pre-specified atlas conditioned on subject-specific characteristics. Sinclair et al [43] proposed Atlas-ISTN, a deep-learning framework to jointly learn segmentation, registration and atlas construction. However, these approaches do not consider a pairwise image alignment loss to improve registration accuracy and their evaluation approaches require the annotation of the built atlas thus is not a measurement that can be easily compared among approaches.…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 shows a comparison between our approach and other closely related learning-based approaches. 3 He et al [25] Dalca et al [12] Evan et al [18] Sinclair et al [43] Aladdin (Ours)…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations