2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-23566-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Atlas of Macroscopic Wood Identification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The 1 mm 2 square in Figure 12B was drawn on the phone screen during equipment calibration. Combined use of lenses attached to a smartphone therefore not only complement traditional observation under 10× magnification of macroscopic features such as those described in other Combined use of lenses attached to a smartphone therefore not only complement traditional observation under 10× magnification of macroscopic features such as those described in other publications [48], but also enables biometry and photo capture in situ. This considerably reduces the time normally required for these tasks and allows agents responsible for monitoring the international timber trade, especially of wood listed in the CITES appendices, to raise an early warning.…”
Section: Biometrymentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The 1 mm 2 square in Figure 12B was drawn on the phone screen during equipment calibration. Combined use of lenses attached to a smartphone therefore not only complement traditional observation under 10× magnification of macroscopic features such as those described in other Combined use of lenses attached to a smartphone therefore not only complement traditional observation under 10× magnification of macroscopic features such as those described in other publications [48], but also enables biometry and photo capture in situ. This considerably reduces the time normally required for these tasks and allows agents responsible for monitoring the international timber trade, especially of wood listed in the CITES appendices, to raise an early warning.…”
Section: Biometrymentioning
confidence: 83%
“…High‐resolution microCT allowed the wood species to be determined as belonging to Fagus sylvatica (Ruffinatto & Crivellaro, 2019: 197) (see Material S5 in the additional supporting information). The radiocarbon age obtained from a fragment of the sheath (930 ± 60 BP) was calibrated using the OxCal v 4.4 and IntCal20 calibration curve (Bronk Ramsey, 2009; Bronk Ramsey et al, 2020; Reimer et al, 2020), giving a range spanning between 1016 CE and 1225 cal.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nothofagus ; for further information see: Patel, 1986 and Poole, 2002), following the most recently accepted classification of oaks (Denk et al, 2017), including also the work of Carlquist (2001), other literature resources (Carlquist and Hoekman (1985); Cutler (1964); Forman (1964); Forman and Cutler (1967); Gupta and Gupta (2020); Kubitzki, Rohwer, and Bittrich (1993); Lee (1968); Lemmens, Soerianegara, and Wong (1995); Pearson and Brown (1932); Serdar and Mazlum (2014); Sharma et al (2011); Sharma, Sharma, Kharkongor, and Carter (2011); Sharma, Shylla, and Sharma (2017); Shimaji (1952, 1954a,b, 1959, 1962); Sudworth and Mell (1911); Manos, Cannon, and Oh (2008); Melville (1982); Mennega (1980); Metcalfe and Chalk (1965); Nixon (2007); Pande et al (2005); Phromprasit et al (2016); Tillson and Muller (1942), observations from atlases (e.g. Akkemik & Yaman, 2012; Grosser, 1977; Ilic, 1991; Ilvessalo‐Pfäffli, 1995; Ruffinatto & Crivellaro, 2019; Schweingruber, 1990) and InsideWood Web site (InsideWood, 2004–onwards), and corrections regarding the validity of the species (concluding to their position in the new classification) from The Plant List (2013):…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%