ICONIP'99. ANZIIS'99 &Amp; ANNES'99 &Amp; ACNN'99. 6th International Conference on Neural Information Processing. Proceedings (
DOI: 10.1109/iconip.1999.845650
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ATM QoS prediction using neural-networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…interactive, bulk transfer, streaming and transactional) and classified streaming traffics into one of these four categories using nearest neighbors and linear discriminant analysis algorithms. Similarly, authors of [19] have defined four QoS classes of different performance levels for the ATM network. Neural network (BP algorithm) is employed to sort traffics with different QoS requirements into one of these classes based on parameters such as cell loss rate and cell delay variation.…”
Section: Overview Of Our Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…interactive, bulk transfer, streaming and transactional) and classified streaming traffics into one of these four categories using nearest neighbors and linear discriminant analysis algorithms. Similarly, authors of [19] have defined four QoS classes of different performance levels for the ATM network. Neural network (BP algorithm) is employed to sort traffics with different QoS requirements into one of these classes based on parameters such as cell loss rate and cell delay variation.…”
Section: Overview Of Our Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They validate their models through simulation and show that by correctly assigning each traffic to a proper service class, overall end-to-end performance (such as delay and throughput) can be improved. It should be noted that [18][19][20][21] classify QoS from performance perspective: applications of similar business nature and QoS requirements are grouped into the same category. In contrast, our work focuses on the direct identification of QoS violations through end-to-end observation and classification.…”
Section: Overview Of Our Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%