1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0168-9274(97)00090-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Atmospheric and ocean modeling with an adaptive finite element solver for the shallow-water equations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our paper focuses on dynamically adaptive grids, which track features of interest during the model simulation by locally adding or removing grid points as needed. Adaptation criteria based on error estimates (e.g., Skamarock et al 1989;Behrens 1998;Blaise and St-Cyr 2012) or flow characteristics (e.g., Hubbard and Nikiforakis 2003;Jablonowski et al 2006Jablonowski et al , 2009St-Cyr et al 2008) can be used to determine where the high-resolution mesh should be placed. By increasing resolution only locally, dynamic refinement significantly decreases the total number of degrees of freedom for the simulation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our paper focuses on dynamically adaptive grids, which track features of interest during the model simulation by locally adding or removing grid points as needed. Adaptation criteria based on error estimates (e.g., Skamarock et al 1989;Behrens 1998;Blaise and St-Cyr 2012) or flow characteristics (e.g., Hubbard and Nikiforakis 2003;Jablonowski et al 2006Jablonowski et al , 2009St-Cyr et al 2008) can be used to determine where the high-resolution mesh should be placed. By increasing resolution only locally, dynamic refinement significantly decreases the total number of degrees of freedom for the simulation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dynamic mesh adaptation strategies following those structures represent a great potential in the field of ocean modelling (e.g. Behrens 1998;Heinze and Hense 2002;Nair et al 2005;Giraldo et al 2002). In this framework of a new unstructured ocean model, we believe that the DG method is a good candidate because it provides a simple and efficient error estimator for any order p, which means a simple and efficient way to deal with mesh adaptivity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A different approach is presented in the work of Behrens [24,25], where the triangular elements indicated for refinement are subdivided making sure the conformity of the edges is preserved. The method allows for local refinement without modifying the entire domain.…”
Section: Amr In Atmospheric Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%