2004
DOI: 10.1021/es049240v
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Atmospheric Dry Deposition of Persistent Organic Pollutants to the Atlantic and Inferences for the Global Oceans

Abstract: Atmospheric deposition to the oceans is a key process affecting the global dynamics and sinks of persistent organic pollutants (POPs). A new methodology that combines aerosol remote sensing measurements with measured POP aerosol-phase concentrations is presented to derive dry particulate depositional fluxes of POPs to the oceans. These fluxes are compared with those due to diffusive air-water exchange. For all polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) congeners and lower chlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and furans (PCDD/Fs)… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

17
131
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 147 publications
(148 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
17
131
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, it is noticeable that Atlantic region was a receptor and the deposition was an important process for the heavier PCB congeners in that region. Relative high dry deposition flux was found around 30 • N to 86 • N in the Atlantic area and the highest value was 500 pg/m 2 /day at 53 • N. This distribution was associated with the high air concentration in that area and consistent with the distribution and magnitude estimated by Jurado et al (2004). Wet deposition flux of PCB180 also presented a correlation to its air concentration: a peak value was predicted from 30 • N to 86 • N. Particle scavenging dominated the wet removal process (Jurado et al, 2005), which agrees with the prediction by GEM/POPs that 92% of the total deposition flux for PCB180 in the meridional region of Atlantic Ocean between 1 • E-20 • E was due to wet scavenging.…”
Section: Removals and Vertical Distributions Of Different Pcb Congenerssupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, it is noticeable that Atlantic region was a receptor and the deposition was an important process for the heavier PCB congeners in that region. Relative high dry deposition flux was found around 30 • N to 86 • N in the Atlantic area and the highest value was 500 pg/m 2 /day at 53 • N. This distribution was associated with the high air concentration in that area and consistent with the distribution and magnitude estimated by Jurado et al (2004). Wet deposition flux of PCB180 also presented a correlation to its air concentration: a peak value was predicted from 30 • N to 86 • N. Particle scavenging dominated the wet removal process (Jurado et al, 2005), which agrees with the prediction by GEM/POPs that 92% of the total deposition flux for PCB180 in the meridional region of Atlantic Ocean between 1 • E-20 • E was due to wet scavenging.…”
Section: Removals and Vertical Distributions Of Different Pcb Congenerssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Compared to other studies (e.g. Jurado et al, 2004), GEM/POPs captured the general pictures of global PCB depositions. For example, it is noticeable that Atlantic region was a receptor and the deposition was an important process for the heavier PCB congeners in that region.…”
Section: Removals and Vertical Distributions Of Different Pcb Congenersmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Deposition of SOCs in air can be divided into dry and wet deposition; both processes contribute significantly to the removal of these SOCs (Jurado et al, 2004). When SOCs are emitted into the atmosphere, they can be partitioned between the gas and particulate phases based on their concentrations, vapor pressures, the atmospheric temperature, and the concentration of particles within it (Hoff et al, 1996).…”
Section: Polychlorinatedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides the sources emission, the meteorological parameters are also decisive factors for the deposition fluxes. For example, temperature can affect the vapor-particle partitioning for SOCs (Jurado et al, 2004). And the intensity, form (rain or snow) and rate of precipitation, wind speed and humidity could have impacts on the washout ratio and/or dry deposition speed, which will cause the variation of deposition fluxes (Lei and Wania, 2004;Li et al, 2009).…”
Section: Spatial and Seasonal Variations Of Atmospheric Deposition Flmentioning
confidence: 99%