Electrical Processes in Atmospheres 1976
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-85294-7_124
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Atmospheric Electricity Activities of the Institute for Atmospheric Environmental Research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
40
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
40
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Concerning Saharan dust, more than a two-fold reduction of atmospheric conductivity within SD layers was observed by Gringel and Mühleisen (1978). The electric field within an SD layer at a 3 km high Alpine peak exceeded fair weather value by a factor of about two, while the current density remained approximately constant (Reiter, 1992). The influence of neutral aerosols on the electric field is a consequence of small ion scavenging by the atmospheric particles (Fuchs, 1963;Hoppel and Frick, 1986;Brazenor and Harrison, 2005).…”
Section: Atmospheric Electric Fieldmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Concerning Saharan dust, more than a two-fold reduction of atmospheric conductivity within SD layers was observed by Gringel and Mühleisen (1978). The electric field within an SD layer at a 3 km high Alpine peak exceeded fair weather value by a factor of about two, while the current density remained approximately constant (Reiter, 1992). The influence of neutral aerosols on the electric field is a consequence of small ion scavenging by the atmospheric particles (Fuchs, 1963;Hoppel and Frick, 1986;Brazenor and Harrison, 2005).…”
Section: Atmospheric Electric Fieldmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…They did not find any clear relationship between the two. When high-latitude data were included, the correlations were even weaker than otherwise, despite the fact that cosmic ray ionization is largest at high latitude [Reiter, 1992]. Kernthaler et al [1999] further found an increase in high cloud cover during a period of decreasing cosmic ray flux.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Estimates of the relative significance of these two forcings vary, but recent studies by Lean [1997] suggested an alternative global warming mechanism through a proposed coupling between galactic cosmic rays and clouds. Solar activity and galactic cosmic ray flux are inversely related [Reiter, 1992], meaning In order to check the validity of the cosmic-raycloud-climate hypothesis we have carefully investigated data sets for global cloud coverage, i.e., data from the International Satellite Cloud Climatology Project (IS-CCP) [Rossow and $chiffer, 1991;1999] Recently, Kernthaler et al [1999] related ISCCP data for different cloud types (high, midlevel, and low) to galactic cosmic ray flux for the period 1985 through 1988. They did not find any clear relationship between the two.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The transport and deposition of H 2 SO 4 vapor are also taken into account in the model. The global ionization rates due to cosmic rays are calculated based on the schemes given in Usoskin and Kovaltsov (2006) and the contribution of radioactive materials from soil to ionization rates is parameterized based on the profiles given in Reiter (1992). We run the GEOS-Chem coupled with nucleation module for one year from 07/01/2001 to 06/30/2002.…”
Section: Simulations and Comparisons With Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%