2014
DOI: 10.1175/jas-d-14-0114.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Atmospheric Kinetic Energy Spectra from Global High-Resolution Nonhydrostatic Simulations

Abstract: Kinetic energy (KE) spectra derived from global high-resolution atmospheric simulations from the Model for Prediction Across Scales (MPAS) are presented. The simulations are produced using quasi-uniform global Voronoi horizontal meshes with 3-, 7.5-, and 15-km mean cell spacings. KE spectra from the MPAS simulations compare well with observations and other simulations in the literature and possess the canonical KE spectra structure including a very-well-resolved shallow-sloped mesoscale region in the 3-km simu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

22
164
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 143 publications
(187 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(68 reference statements)
22
164
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Models also show a pattern of enhanced mesoscale energies in regions of high topography (Hamilton et al, 2008). The simulations further show that the mesoscale spectrum is not the result of stratified turbulence (Skamarock et al, 2014), in agreement with our conclusion that they are the signature of inertia-gravity waves.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Models also show a pattern of enhanced mesoscale energies in regions of high topography (Hamilton et al, 2008). The simulations further show that the mesoscale spectrum is not the result of stratified turbulence (Skamarock et al, 2014), in agreement with our conclusion that they are the signature of inertia-gravity waves.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…In this context, we note that recent atmospheric simulations show that the crossing between the wave and vortex modes occur at a smaller scale for the tropospheric (less stable) flow than for the stratospheric (more stable) flow [41], in agreement with our k R ∼ F r −1 result.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Another avenue for progress in understanding the mesoscale dynamics is to build on work with numerical models that resolve the mesoscale range (e.g., Hamilton et al 2008;Skamarock et al 2014;Bierdel et al 2016). These models have been shown to compare favorably against observations and could be used to more extensively explore the dynamics of mesoscale flows.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%