2010
DOI: 10.1021/es100366d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Atmospheric Pb and Ti Accumulation Rates from Sphagnum Moss: Dependence upon Plant Productivity

Abstract: The accumulation rates of atmospheric Pb and Ti were obtained using the production rates of Sphagnum mosses collected in four ombrotrophic bogs from two regions of southern Germany: Upper Bavaria (Oberbayern, OB) and the Northern Black Forest (Nordschwarzwald, NBF). Surfaces of Sphagnum carpets were marked with plastic mesh and one year later the production of plant matter was harvested. Metal concentrations were determined in acid digests using sector field ICP-MS employing well established analytical procedu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
19
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
3
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering the presence of ericaceous shrubs, but no overhanging pine, at site F1, this is in good agreement with a number of studies reporting that an increased interception area, i.e., a canopy, will increase mercury deposition (Lindberg et al, 1998;Zhang et al, 2009). It has also been reported that a higher plant growth rate can increase the interception of metals (Kempter et al, 2010), and because the vertical peat accumulation for site S1 and F1 is similar, but the decomposition slightly higher in the latter (as indicated by the bulk density), the F1-site likely has a slightly higher plant growth rate, which can contribute to the difference in deposition between the two sites. However, mercury concentrations between the two sites differ by 42-61% for living mosses, 63% for the topmost peat and 77-96% for mercury inventories, which are all greater than the 33% difference indicated by the unsupported 210 Pb inventories.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Considering the presence of ericaceous shrubs, but no overhanging pine, at site F1, this is in good agreement with a number of studies reporting that an increased interception area, i.e., a canopy, will increase mercury deposition (Lindberg et al, 1998;Zhang et al, 2009). It has also been reported that a higher plant growth rate can increase the interception of metals (Kempter et al, 2010), and because the vertical peat accumulation for site S1 and F1 is similar, but the decomposition slightly higher in the latter (as indicated by the bulk density), the F1-site likely has a slightly higher plant growth rate, which can contribute to the difference in deposition between the two sites. However, mercury concentrations between the two sites differ by 42-61% for living mosses, 63% for the topmost peat and 77-96% for mercury inventories, which are all greater than the 33% difference indicated by the unsupported 210 Pb inventories.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…7 A recent study of Sphagnum moss from four bogs in two regions of southern Germany (DE) showed that accumulation rates obtained from Pb analysis of Sphagnum were in good agreement with direct deposition measurements for the same regions. 8 …”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…221 Results from two different sampling sites in Germany were compared and attention was paid to both intrasite and species-dependent variation. Important for drawing meaningful ecological considerations is that the accumulation was seen to largely depend on the annual dry-matter production rate of the mosses.…”
Section: Plant Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%