1988
DOI: 10.1021/ac00171a012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Atmospheric sampling glow discharge ionization source for the determination of trace organic compounds in ambient air

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
153
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 190 publications
(159 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
6
153
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ϫ ] Ϸ 0.8 at steady-state. In addition, the positive ion number density is seen to be substantially larger than the negative ion number density, an effect observed experimentally in the ASGDI source [15]. The calculated [P ϩ ] values are also consistent with those predicted and experimentally observed [21] in the HPEC source, which is also recombinationdominated.…”
Section: Functional Dynamicssupporting
confidence: 84%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Ϫ ] Ϸ 0.8 at steady-state. In addition, the positive ion number density is seen to be substantially larger than the negative ion number density, an effect observed experimentally in the ASGDI source [15]. The calculated [P ϩ ] values are also consistent with those predicted and experimentally observed [21] in the HPEC source, which is also recombinationdominated.…”
Section: Functional Dynamicssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Because a detailed description of an ASGDI source as applied to the detection of trace organics in ambient air has previously been presented [15], only the salient characteristics of the apparatus pertaining to its dynamics will be presented here. The standard configuration, shown schematically in Figure 1, is comprised of a stainless steel, right cylinder (ϳ4 cm diameter) with the ends enclosed by two electrically isolated, stainless steel, circular plates.…”
Section: Basic Operationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Compared to the apparatus depicted in Figure 7, the major change of the instrumentation was the replacement of the heated filament by an ASGDI source. The ASGDI source can be used to form either positive or negative reagent ions, but the main motivation for replacing in situ electron ionization with the discharge source is the bright anion beams that can be generated via the discharge for species with relatively high cross sections for electron capture [52]. With the arrangement shown in Figure 8, each ion source is independently controlled and all the ion species are formed outside the ion trap.…”
Section: Ionization Approaches With 3d Ion Trapsmentioning
confidence: 99%