2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10915-014-9830-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Atmospheric Sound Propagation Over Large-Scale Irregular Terrain

Abstract: A benchmark problem on atmospheric sound propagation over irregular terrain has been solved using a stable fourth-order accurate nite dierence approximation of a high-delity acoustic model. A comparison with the parabolic equation method and ray tracing methods is made. The results show that ray tracing methods can potentially be unreliable in the presence of irregular terrain.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Remark The dispersion relation (3) shows that the wave speed scales as κ. Hence, the physics require k h 2 , to capture the high-frequency part of the solution.…”
Section: Explicit Runge-kutta Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Remark The dispersion relation (3) shows that the wave speed scales as κ. Hence, the physics require k h 2 , to capture the high-frequency part of the solution.…”
Section: Explicit Runge-kutta Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Remark The dispersion relation (3) shows that the wave speed scales as κ. This means that we will have to take much smaller time-step (k) compared to the spatial grid-size (h), in order to resolve the fastest going waves (i.e., the high-frequency part of the solution).…”
Section: The Dynamic Beam Equationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In applications (Section 1), other geometries will likely be considered, some much more complicated than Figure 1. While our methods can handle more complicated geometry, this is (to the best of our knowledge) the first work looking to establish benchmarks -and compare numerical methods -for parabolic interface problems (3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9). As such, we think that the geometries in Figure 1 are a good "baseline"without all the added complexities that more complicated geometries might produce -from which further research, or more involved comparisons, might be done.…”
Section: The Composite Domain Problemmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Let us now briefly introduce the DPM for the numerical approximation of parabolic interface models (3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9). First, we must introduce the point-sets that will be used throughout the DPM.…”
Section: Dpmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation