“…Scholars over the past decade and a half have provided a critical point from which to force a much wider 'vertical turn' away from the Euclidian tendency running through spatial disciplines (Graham, 2016) and ensuing forms of conceptual horizontalism (Graham and Hewitt, 2013;McNeill, 2005;Murawski, 2018b). By attending to the asymmetries of power relations and the ways they bear on societies, subjectivities and space (Adey, 2010b;Weizman, 2012) scholars have adopted a language that foregrounds the 'volumetric' (Elden, 2013;Graham, 2004), 'voluminous' (Bille´, 2020), 'spherical' (Sloterdijk, 2011a(Sloterdijk, , 2011b, 'aerial' (Adey, 2010a;McCormack, 2009), 'atmospheric' (Borch, 2014;McCormack, 2008McCormack, , 2018 or 'nephospheric' (Garrett and Anderson, 2018). Research through such frameworks has explored how vertical spaces are practised (Baxter, 2017;Ghosh, 2014), represented (Butt, 2018Hewitt and Graham, 2015) and imagined (Roast, 2019), suggesting that the ontological turn towards 'volumetrics' helps develop multimodal and multi-dimensional understandings of cities and urban spaces (Harris, 2015;McNeill, 2020).…”