2007
DOI: 10.1109/lgrs.2007.895691
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Atmospheric Turbulence-Degraded Image Restoration Using Principal Components Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
67
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first image is obtained by applying the Lucky Region Fusion (LRF) method [2] to the first 100 frames of the image sequence that we have treated throughout this paper (column (i) of Figure 12), and we can see that while the geometry is reconstructed well the final result is still considerably blurry. The second image in Figure 13 is yielded by the Principal Component Analysis (PCA) technique described in [24], once again applied to the first 100 images of the same sequence: this method also reconstructs the geometry of the underlying scene correctly, and does a better job at deblurring than LRF does. However our method (albeit considerably slower than the first two) yields a result, shown on the right, that is considerably sharper.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The first image is obtained by applying the Lucky Region Fusion (LRF) method [2] to the first 100 frames of the image sequence that we have treated throughout this paper (column (i) of Figure 12), and we can see that while the geometry is reconstructed well the final result is still considerably blurry. The second image in Figure 13 is yielded by the Principal Component Analysis (PCA) technique described in [24], once again applied to the first 100 images of the same sequence: this method also reconstructs the geometry of the underlying scene correctly, and does a better job at deblurring than LRF does. However our method (albeit considerably slower than the first two) yields a result, shown on the right, that is considerably sharper.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They perform image registration via Large Deformation Diffeomorphic Metric Mapping (LDDMM), introduced by Miller et al [4,30,46] which is computationally very expensive; moreover the final results depend heavily on the choice of the parameters of the LD-DMM registration. Li et al [24] use Principal Component Analysis (PCA) to deblur a sequence of turbulent images, simply by taking the statistically most significant vector as their estimate for the original static image; instead, Hirsch et al [21] formulate a space-variant deblurring algorithm that is seemingly computationally treatable. However neither [24] nor [21] address the issue of domain deformation and thus are only suitable when the geometric distortion is reasonably small.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A long-distance imaging system can be strongly affected by atmospheric turbulence, which randomly changes the refractive index along the optical transmission path, generating geometric distortion (motion), space and timevarying blur, and sometimes even motion blur if the exposure time is not sufficiently short [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]. Aside from hardware-based adaptive optics approaches [6], several signal processing approaches have been proposed to solve this problem [7], [8], [4], [5], [9], [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methods have been analyzed or presented oriented towards different applications such as interpretation of long distance surveillance data [1], reduction of atmospheric effects [2], bi-level signals [3,4] and photography [5]. More general techniques have been developed as well, varying in complexity [6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%