2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3800(01)00434-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Atmospheric urban pollution: applications of an artificial neural network (ANN) to the city of Perugia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
72
0
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 141 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
72
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The selected input variables and their aggregation are presented in Table 1. In principle, it might be surprising to use a linear approach, i.e., cross-correlation analysis, in order to select the inputs of non-linear models; nevertheless, such a procedure leads generally to satisfactory outcomes and constitutes a de facto standard for this kind of studies (see, for instance, Viotti et al, 2002;Nunnari et al, 1998;Ziomas et al, 1995;Balaguer Ballester et al, 2002). The average goodness of the prediction is firstly evaluated by a series of indicators, such as the true/predicted correlation ρ, the mean absolute error MAE = (1/D)( |y(t) −ŷ(t)|), the mean bias error MBE = (1/D)( y(t) −ŷ(t)), and the index of agreement d = 1 − ( (y(t) −ŷ(t)) 2 / (|ŷ(t) − y(t)| − |y(t) −ȳ (t)|)).…”
Section: Results: Ozonementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The selected input variables and their aggregation are presented in Table 1. In principle, it might be surprising to use a linear approach, i.e., cross-correlation analysis, in order to select the inputs of non-linear models; nevertheless, such a procedure leads generally to satisfactory outcomes and constitutes a de facto standard for this kind of studies (see, for instance, Viotti et al, 2002;Nunnari et al, 1998;Ziomas et al, 1995;Balaguer Ballester et al, 2002). The average goodness of the prediction is firstly evaluated by a series of indicators, such as the true/predicted correlation ρ, the mean absolute error MAE = (1/D)( |y(t) −ŷ(t)|), the mean bias error MBE = (1/D)( y(t) −ŷ(t)), and the index of agreement d = 1 − ( (y(t) −ŷ(t)) 2 / (|ŷ(t) − y(t)| − |y(t) −ȳ (t)|)).…”
Section: Results: Ozonementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The neural network approach proved to be viable also for ozone forecasting, outperforming alternative techniques in different case studies (Prybutok et al, 2000;Balaguer Ballester et al, 2002;Nunnari et al, 1998;Viotti et al, 2002). A remarkable intercomparison of statistical approaches -involving 15 different statistical techniques, 10 different sites across Europe and different forecast horizons -has been carried out (Schlink et al, 2003) in the context of the AP-PETISE project.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ANNs are parallel-distributed systems made of many interconnected non-linear processing elements (PEs), called neurons (Hecht-Nielsen, 1991). A renewal of scientific interest has grown exponentially since the last decade, mainly due to the availability of appropriate hardware that has made them convenient for fast data analysis and information processing (Viotti et al, 2002). Many ANN models have been developed in the last fifteen years for very different environmental purposes (Nunnari et al, 1998;Prybutok et al, 2000;Heymans and Baird, 2000;Karul et al, 2000;Antonic et al, 2001;Kolehmainen et al, 2001;Balaguer Ballester et al, 2002;Schlink et al, 2003;Corani, 2005;Slini et al, 2006;Dutot et al, 2007;Papanastasiou et al, 2007;Moustris et al, 2010a;.…”
Section: Artificial Neural Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Models are used to generally assess particle concentration in a workplace environment under different meteorological conditions and its outputs are evaluated against the requirements of air quality regulations (Vardoulaki et al 2003;Viotti et al 2002;Cohn et al 2001). Majority of the models for estimation of the concentration of PM in a workplace environment are of empirical in nature where statistical approaches have been used to develop the model (Lal and Tripathy 2012;Vardoulaki et al 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[PDF] 2002), soil analysis (Juang and Chen 1999), water treatment application (Baxter et al 2002), traffic and vehicular pollution (Nagendra and Khare 2004) and PM concentration prediction from the different sources in the opencast mines (Lal and Tripathy 2012). Earlier studies reported that ANN based air quality models give better results than other statistical models Lu et al 2003;Viotti et al 2002). The advantages of ANN model over statistical model are as follows: (i) it do not require detailed physical models, (ii) it is more compact than large experiment data, (iii) it requires few training points to accurately model the standards, (iv) it can be trained with only a few experiments data, and (v) it can be much more accurate than statistical models, when limited experimental data are available.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%