2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/cvpr.2019.00479
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ATOM: Accurate Tracking by Overlap Maximization

Abstract: While recent years have witnessed astonishing improvements in visual tracking robustness, the advancements in tracking accuracy have been limited. As the focus has been directed towards the development of powerful classifiers, the problem of accurate target state estimation has been largely overlooked. In fact, most trackers resort to a simple multi-scale search in order to estimate the target bounding box. We argue that this approach is fundamentally limited since target estimation is a complex task, requirin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
1,162
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,262 publications
(1,164 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
1,162
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this work, we introduce an alternative tracking architecture, trained in an end-to-end manner, that directly addresses all aforementioned limitations. In our design, we take inspiration from the discriminative learning procedures that have been successfully applied in recent trackers [26,7,4]. Our approach is based on a target model prediction network, which is derived from a discriminative learning loss by applying an iterative optimization procedure.…”
Section: Imagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this work, we introduce an alternative tracking architecture, trained in an end-to-end manner, that directly addresses all aforementioned limitations. In our design, we take inspiration from the discriminative learning procedures that have been successfully applied in recent trackers [26,7,4]. Our approach is based on a target model prediction network, which is derived from a discriminative learning loss by applying an iterative optimization procedure.…”
Section: Imagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally the top-performance trackers are shown in Figure 6. We compare with trackers including DRT [37], DeepSTRCF [28], LSART [38], R MCPF [48], SRCT [25], CSRDCF [30], LADCF [44], MFT [22], UPDT [2] and ATOM [8] among others as in [22]. Among the top trackers, our approach achieves superior performance while maintaining a very high efficiency.…”
Section: Generality and Tracking Speedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A3CTD increases additionally the performance of A3CT, with an improvement of 1% in AO, 1.8 in SR 0.50 but with a loss of 0.7% in SR 0.75 . We perform worse than ATOM [6], however we remark that these results are obtained considering just 1782 of the 9335 sequences (19%) contained in the GOT-10k training set.…”
Section: Kcf Mdnet Eco Ccot Goturnmentioning
confidence: 73%