1993
DOI: 10.1021/j100124a039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Atom charge transfer in molecular polarizabilities: application of the Olson-Sundberg model to aliphatic and aromatic hydrocarbons

Abstract: The atom monopoledipole interaction model of Olson and Sundberg is used to calculate molecular dipole polarizability tensors of aliphatic and aromatic hydrocarbons for light in the visible region. Atom monopole and dipole polarizabilities are optimized to fit experimental mean polarizabilities and anisotropies for seven alkanes and five planar aromatic hydrocarbons. For alkanes the best fit is obtained with vanishing atom monopole polarizabilities; i.e., for the model in which no atom charge transfer occurs. F… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
115
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(123 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
8
115
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed the distances are so short that the major contributions come from higher order DID interactions. Irrespective to the relative success of the method, various authors [22,23,24] have modified the scheme adding mono-pole polarizability, and/or using non isotropic atomic polarizability, and/or separating atoms of the same species on the base of chemical bonds. Only a few attempts have been made so far to use the Applequist formalism to calculate the experimental spectra [16], and with doubtful improvements.…”
Section: Polarizability Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed the distances are so short that the major contributions come from higher order DID interactions. Irrespective to the relative success of the method, various authors [22,23,24] have modified the scheme adding mono-pole polarizability, and/or using non isotropic atomic polarizability, and/or separating atoms of the same species on the base of chemical bonds. Only a few attempts have been made so far to use the Applequist formalism to calculate the experimental spectra [16], and with doubtful improvements.…”
Section: Polarizability Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It calculates tensor effective anisotropic point polarizabilities by the method of Applequist et al [19,20,[48][49][50]. One considers the molecule as being made up of N atoms (i, j, k,…), each of which acts as a point particle located at the nucleus and responds to an electric field only by the induction of a dipole moment which is a linear function of the local field.…”
Section: Interacting Induced Dipoles Polarization Model For Molecularmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modern theoretical chemistry, with the help of powerful computers, can attempt to become a substitute for difficult experimental determinations [18]. Classical models such as the dipole interaction model and its improvements, which were investigated among others by Applequist [19,20] are able to predict molecular polarizabilities with surprising accuracy. Because of their simplicity they can be conveniently implemented in molecular force fields to account for the non-additivity effects in the intermolecular interactions [14][15][16][21][22][23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this model gave a good (within 10%) agreement with experiment for medium polarizabilities and an unsatisfactory agreement for the main components of polarizability and anisotropy. This concept was further developed in [8], with anisotropic effects included, and then in [9], where the repulsion of electrons was taken into account.Further complication and modification of the model, made in [10,11], failed to improve significantly the agreement between the quantities mentioned. The last study employing this model and some of its preceding modifications was performed in 1999.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further complication and modification of the model, made in [10,11], failed to improve significantly the agreement between the quantities mentioned. The last study employing this model and some of its preceding modifications was performed in 1999.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%