2021
DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c02334
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Atomic Electrostatic Maps of Point Defects in MoS2

Abstract: In this study, we use differential phase contrast images obtained by scanning transmission electron microscopy combined with computer simulations to map the atomic electrostatic fields of MoS2 monolayers and investigate the effect of sulfur monovacancies and divancancies on the atomic electric field and total charge distribution. A significant redistribution of the electric field in the regions containing defects is observed, with a progressive decrease in the strength of the projected electric field for each … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, a segmented detector does not record the bright field disk directly but interprets a CoM shift from quadrant signal differences, meaning it is less sensitive to intensity redistribution within the quadrant and can be affected by the orientation between detector segments and field vector. There are various reports on electric field and charge density measurements in perovskite (SrTiO 3 , DyScO 3 , BiFeO 3 ) and GaN where the electric field drops to a minimum at the center of an atom position, which helps to locate and differentiate light elements. There are also studies on 2D materials including graphene, MoS 2 , ,, and WS 2 with some interesting electric field states and magnitude increases observed at the monolayer/bilayer step edge in graphene. However, more work is needed to image periodic uniform edge terminations in 2D crystals to fully understand the electric field distributions and intensities measured by 4D-STEM.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, a segmented detector does not record the bright field disk directly but interprets a CoM shift from quadrant signal differences, meaning it is less sensitive to intensity redistribution within the quadrant and can be affected by the orientation between detector segments and field vector. There are various reports on electric field and charge density measurements in perovskite (SrTiO 3 , DyScO 3 , BiFeO 3 ) and GaN where the electric field drops to a minimum at the center of an atom position, which helps to locate and differentiate light elements. There are also studies on 2D materials including graphene, MoS 2 , ,, and WS 2 with some interesting electric field states and magnitude increases observed at the monolayer/bilayer step edge in graphene. However, more work is needed to image periodic uniform edge terminations in 2D crystals to fully understand the electric field distributions and intensities measured by 4D-STEM.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are various reports on electric field and charge density measurements in perovskite (SrTiO 3 , DyScO 3 , BiFeO 3 ) and GaN where the electric field drops to a minimum at the center of an atom position, which helps to locate and differentiate light elements. 18−21 There are also studies on 2D materials including graphene, 22 MoS 2 , 14,23,24 and WS 2 25 with some interesting electric field states and magnitude increases observed at the monolayer/bilayer step edge in graphene. However, more work is needed to image periodic uniform edge terminations in 2D crystals to fully understand the electric field distributions and intensities measured by 4D-STEM.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To quantify [V] at different stages and accurately analyze the effect of defect engineering, we employed aberration-corrected STEM to examine the lattice conditions and made statistics on [V] over multiple areas and samples. At first, the samples were prepared using a wet-transfer method (see Methods for details) and transferred onto STEM grids (Figure a). Figure b shows the schematic atomic structures for a 2H-MoS 2 monolayer viewed from the basal plane and cross-section, where the blue and yellow balls represent the Mo and S atoms, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proponents of this argument have generally focused on sulfur vacancy (vac S ) defects [15][16][17][18][19] , and indeed, chalcogen vacancies are found to have the lowest formation energy in TMDCs for typical growth conditions 45,51 . S vacancies have also been observed in scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) and scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) images of bare 58,59 and Au(111)-supported 60 monolayer MoS 2 .…”
Section: Role Of Defectsmentioning
confidence: 93%