2008
DOI: 10.1063/1.2839019
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Atomic force microscope cantilever spring constant evaluation for higher mode oscillations: A kinetostatic method

Abstract: Our previous study of the particle mass sensor has shown a large ratio (up to thousands) between the spring constants of a rectangular cantilever in higher mode vibration and at the static bending or natural mode vibration. This has been proven by us through the derived nodal point position equation. That solution is good for a cantilever with the free end in noncontact regime and the probe shifted from the end to an effective section and contacting a soft object. Our further research shows that the same nodal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This indicates that the elastic constant of the thin bar increases considerably when one goes to higher normal modes. This is in qualitative agreement with a theory of vibrating cantilevers [22]. The amplitude of the forced vibrations of the third normal mode was below the threshold of detection by our optical sensor, nevertheless around a drive frequency of 320 Hz we could hear a sharp increase in the sound generated by the vibrating bar.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…This indicates that the elastic constant of the thin bar increases considerably when one goes to higher normal modes. This is in qualitative agreement with a theory of vibrating cantilevers [22]. The amplitude of the forced vibrations of the third normal mode was below the threshold of detection by our optical sensor, nevertheless around a drive frequency of 320 Hz we could hear a sharp increase in the sound generated by the vibrating bar.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…(14) by simply calibrating the spring constant, Q factor, and natural resonant frequency for the corresponding mode and inserting the corresponding values in the equation. 10,11,53,54 The instantaneous force F ts (d) during tip approach (_ z 1 < 0) and tip retraction (_ z 1 > 0) as recovered for n ¼ 10 ( Fig. 3(a)), n ¼ 30 (Fig.…”
Section: A Numerical Example Of Force Reconstructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several methods are available for calculating the spring constant of the AFM probe, such as the thermal fluctuation measurement method, the kinetostatic method, the heterodyne interferometry method, and the extended added micro-drop method. [22][23][24] The Sader method 25 was used here for determining the spring constant and calculated to be 37.5 N/m. The tip of the cantilever was characterized by Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscopy (FESEM) (JEOL JSM-7600F).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%