2000
DOI: 10.1016/s1359-6454(00)00187-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Atomic force microscope study of stress-induced martensite formation and its reverse transformation in a thermomechanically treated Fe–Mn–Si–Cr–Ni alloy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
51
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
51
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…15,16) When Otsuka et al 3) first reported that the SME in Fe-Mn-Si based alloys was greatly improved by "training", they attributed it to the increased yield stress of austenite and the concurrent decrease of the critical stress to induce martensitic transformation. However, Kajiwara and his coworkers 7,17) noticed that this is not the only factor for the improvement in SME.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…15,16) When Otsuka et al 3) first reported that the SME in Fe-Mn-Si based alloys was greatly improved by "training", they attributed it to the increased yield stress of austenite and the concurrent decrease of the critical stress to induce martensitic transformation. However, Kajiwara and his coworkers 7,17) noticed that this is not the only factor for the improvement in SME.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, it was found very recently by atomic force microscopy study that several cycles of the training are necessary to create a high fraction of the single variant martensite in the Fe-Mn-Si based alloys. 16) Obviously, such a "training" treatment would not be easy for most conceivable applications and, then, would certainly raise the cost of processing and the difficulty of dimensional control in fabrication of the applicable materials and products. Therefore, it is desired to develop new Fe-MnSi based shape memory alloys that need only few cycles of training or even do not need any training.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This non-thermoelastic or semi-thermoelastic conversion occurred by the creation of stacking faults (SFs) due to the movement of the Shockley partial dislocations (a γ /6 <112>) in the parent phase. SFs are suitable sites for nucleation of the martensite phase; eventually, the ε-phase can be formed by their overlap [12,[17][18][19][20][21][22][23].Although induction melting under an argon gas atmosphere is widely utilized to produce Fe-based SMAs, solid-state routes such as mechanical alloying (MA) can be used to produce the alloys in the powder form [24]. During MA, by applying the high energy collision between ball and particles and consequently the repeated cold welding and fracture of the powders, not only is the alloying process attained but also the synthesis of the non-equilibrium structures such as supersaturated solid solutions, nanocrystalline and amorphous structures, and intermetallic compounds is possible [24][25][26][27][28].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, assuming that the Shockley partial dislocations, once nucleated, should travel all the way to the grain boundary, the travel path would be smaller, the smaller the grain size is. As shown by Bergeon et al,14) if the deformation is large or the grain size is large, as in this work, more than one variant needs to be activated to accommodate the shear strain. The consequence is the necessity of higher stress to induce the martensite and, for the same amount of macroscopic deformation, the volume fraction of stress-induced martensite would be lower in the samples with larger grain size, as observed in this work.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%